C'mon TC- squashing up a timeline is not sufficient.
Science derives its timeline of Earth through a vast variety of corroborating methods of dating and gological analysis. You attempt to disprove these methods that bind you. when you "successfully achieve this quest", you are free to make whatever changes you like to the geological timeline.
Of course, this is not in the slightest sufficient. You cannot simply thros things out without evidence. You cannot tell me that the continents split in a year or so, without demonstrating that this is possible, or even probable. You haven't a single dating method that proves your timescale, not a single fossil that defies evolutionary explanation, and not a single shread of evidence to indicate that
a) civilizations were built only after the flood
b) polar flips, which would have without doubt caused an ecological disaster of unimaginable magnitude accurred rapidly a few thousand years ago
c) the continents could have separated with unimaginable speed.
etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
My dare to you is to prove that the continents could have split at the suggested speed.