What part of: "ONE OR OTHER OF THE KINGDON-LEVEL CLASSIFICATIONS IS STILL WIDELY EMPLOYED AS A USEFUL WAY OF GROUPING ORGANISMS"... don't you hard heads understand???
What part of "the Linneus model is not employed whatsoever becuase it has been found to be in error and thus, useless to tell us anything about the natural relationships of living things to each other" don't YOU understand?
Besides that, when the 2 Kingdom system was in use, bacteria were classified as an animal.
Their discoverer, Leeuwenhoek, wrote a letter to the Royal Society in 1676 which began In the year of 1675 I difcover’d living creatures
in Rain water which had stood but a few day in a new tub, that was painted blue within.1 This observation provoked me to investigate this water more narrowly; and especially because these little animals were, to my eye, more than ten thousand times smaller than the animalcule which Swam-meidam' has portrayed, and called by the name of Water-flea. or Water-louse, which yon can see alive and moving in water with the bare eye.
He referred to bacteria as "creatures" that he called "animalcules" and compared to tiny insects.
Linneaus, himself, designated "animalcules" (bacteria) as a type of insect, namely a coccus
in Systema Naturae and John Hill of Petersborough included the bacteria microlife in his book "A History of Animals": a treatise written in 1752.
The study of bacteria in the time of the 2 Kingdom System was a study of entomology.
If we are going to apply your 2 Kingdom theory to the bible, we will apply it consistently. In the 2 kingdom system, bacteria fall in the "Animalia" category. So, the first living things, according to the system that you insist upon using, were animals.
So the bible is still wrong, even using the 2 kingdom system.