Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kofh2u spam
Eli
Member (Idle past 3491 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


(3)
Message 1 of 12 (693060)
03-10-2013 2:21 PM


Can we get this under control?
I have seen Kofh2u post these images at least a fifty times.
EvC Forum: The God Hypothesis
It would be great if someone could enforce a "You already made that post in thread a, b, c, d. It has not and is still not been relevant. Suspension will result from any more postings of these images."

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 2:25 PM Eli has seen this message but not replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3491 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 3 of 12 (693066)
03-10-2013 2:42 PM


Mod?

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3491 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 8 of 12 (693086)
03-10-2013 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by CoolBeans
03-10-2013 3:05 PM


You know I look at that picture, but I cant stop thinking. What if we find more homind fossils of our evolutionary tree?
We have. We have documented over 50 distinct hominid species. Kofh2u ignores this in favor of his bias.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 3:05 PM CoolBeans has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 6:43 PM Eli has seen this message but not replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3491 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 9 of 12 (693088)
03-10-2013 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by kofh2u
03-10-2013 6:06 PM


Re: ...analogy and correspondences are derived for illustration purposes...
That doesn't answer how the labels were derived or by what authority.
You also purposely confuse the issue by pairing up your doctored images that you created and that you have no scientific basis for with the book that you post the cover of.
Those images are not in the book, yet you pair them with it as if they are, thus confusing the context of the book and being dishonest in your citation.
Your "correspondences" have already been refuted with evidence. Your claims are false. We are beyond that. You are posting these images in threads regardless of the topic and are spamming. The issue is not whether you are correct or not (which you are not) but whether or not your spam is relevant to the thread (which it is not).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 6:06 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024