Summations Only

They can't. That is why it is an irrational world view. I truly believe the crazy conspiracy people are trying to take over.

What is the need for your uncivil accusatory tone? Good grief. Is it POSSIBLE for you or others here to speak in a decent civil manner giving just a tad of benefit of the doubt or is that just beyond you? Yes I can probably find the paper, although it might not be easy, what's the need for the accusatory condemnatory attitude? It was written by a Jesuit professor at some University in the East, Georgetown perhaps, or Fordham. Do you really want me to dig it up? This democratic elective government is turning into something else these days, perhaps you haven't noticed. And that is exactly what the founders anticipated, that government CAN turn into somethng tyrannical no matter how well intentioned its beginnings. Anyone who would talk to me as you did, in such condemnatory tones as if I am blaming the victims of murderers by saying that the gun control push comes from tyrants and oppressors, is on the wrong side of this no matter what side you think you are on. Just LISTEN TO YOURSELF. What have I said or done to deserve such an attitude? Get off your moral high horse and see if it's possible to be a human being. I've said NOTHING to deserve being talked to like this,. What on EARTH are you talking about? Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

So all people from the inner city and unions (police, fireman, teachers,) etc want to take away there own rights and become zombies of the federal government. Is that what you are stating?Might as well say any one who is not a White Anglo Saxon Protestant, Muslim and black-hating, American Citizen is an enemy to the US Constitution and of the US itself. Let's just keep going down this delusional conspiracy theory road.Weapons for resistance. What resistance. There would be no resistance to the US military if they sided against you. You are delusional to think otherwise. 115 naval ships, thousands of nucler weapons, etc, etc, etc to bomb you from here to kingdom come. Preventing this is the fact that we are law-abiding US citizens who love our countries and have families who are US citizens that we love. No amount of weaponry you have would make a difference unless you had the same weaponry as the US military.Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

Good grief?I have tried to be civil, you are the one that said WAKE UP and I chose to ignore it.Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

Give respect and you will get respect. Or is that too Christian of you. Do I want you to back up your assertions. Let me see. How about YES.

All that because I said "Wake up?" Wow. Talk about a handgun against a nuclear weapon.

You know nothing about me Faith. Again, your self-righteous, condescending nature shows through.

I think the Union members in the iron mines of RURAL northern Minnesota would have a problem with you claiming rural people cannot be union people. I am in rural WI, we are strong union here, also polls will show a strong majority of people here and throughout the nation support more gun controls.You are a hatemonger. Why don't you take your hate to where it belongs, like The Blaze and Redstate.

You've lost your mind.I'll see if I can find the paper.

How about you listen to yourself? You come on here condescending anyone who disagrees with you. Telling them to wake up. How do you think a person is going to react. Really?

No Faith, you never say anything derogatory. You never demean anyone on here. Only everyone else is crazy, demeaning, spiteful, vindictive etc. etc, etc.Pot calling kettle much? OR if you prefer Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

Handgun to nuclear weapon: cool it please. If you're that sensitive I'll try to be nicer, but I really don't see that anything I said deserved the barrage I got from you.NEVERTHELESS I'll try to be nicer.Meanwhile here's the information on the Professor who suggested trashing the Constitution just because he thinks we don't need it any more, it's outdated and so on. I'm a little surprised this isn't already well known but anyway here's the info.He is Louis Michael Seidman, Professor of Constitutional Law yet, at Georgetown University: Seidman’s piece at the NYTimesVideo of Seidman denouncing the ConstitutionAnd a couple of Google pages showing what seems to me to be growing popular sentiment against the Constitution and the Second Amendment in particular: Google page Second Amendment outdatedGoogle page Constitution outdated

Whatever dude. I will read and get back to you. Must go to bed to get up at 3am.

Look, I could go back through this thread and find all the derogatory nasty accusations against me and those on my side, but I don't care enough. We've regularly been called insane, "gun nuts," and accused of disregarding the victims of murderers just as you accused me. And that's all I can remember off the top of my head. You haven't noticed? But you want me, one of what, five or six on this thread who share my opinion, to avoid all remarks of that sort against our opponents? Really, DA, you have no sense of proportion. Or you're just so hypersensitive one must walk on eggs around you. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Before I leave for the night I will leave a quote and see if you can find the author. In a gist, the author states that basically the US Constitution is a man-made document subject to fallacy and able to be amended and revised by each living generation. The Constitution is a living document and has changed through amendments through US history.