According to Genesis, Noah collected his family and the animals of the world on his a

Yes they CAN BOTH be Homo erectus, since there were two co-existing kinds of Homo erecti.Homo ergaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Homo ergaster
Temporal range: Pleistocene, 1.8—1.3Ma
PreЄЄOSDCPTJKPgN
↓Skull KNM-ER 3733 discovered by Bernard Ngeneo in 1975 (Kenya)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Genus: Homo
Species: H. ergaster [aka early Homo erectus]Homo ergaster
Groves and Mazk, 1975
Homo ergaster (also "African Homo erectus") is an extinct chronospecies of Homo that lived in eastern and southern Africa during the early Pleistocene, between 1.8 million and 1.3 million years ago.
There is still disagreement on the subject of the classification, ancestry, and progeny of H. ergaster,...
... but \[B\]it is now widely accepted (Homo ergaster) to be the direct ancestor of later hominids such as Homo heidelbergensis, Homo sapiens, and Homo neanderthalensis AND Asian Homo erectus.You seem to be in need of this thread and fail, imho, to be qualified to decide whether I know what I am talking about or not. Note again for clarity, that African Homo erectus is diferent from Asian Homo Erectus is evidenced in that the former is usually called Ergaster.Edited by kofh2u, : No reason given.

Why????
Why in the devil would I need more evidence than that which the paleontologists have dug up, to show that the ascent to modern man was through 22 kinds of links from the first Adam to appear on Earth, since my ONLY point is that the Bible says this is so.The scientist have come up with the evidence that agrees with he 22 names of creatures mentioned in the Genesis genealogy, though they have called them their own names.THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN WHAT SCIENCE SAYS TODAY AND THE BIBLE SAID IN 1362BC IS ONE-TO ONE: Book: The Last Human: A Guide to Twenty-Two Species of Extinct Humans
by G.J.Sawyer, (Author)

These issues have nothing to do with the questions I've been asking.Threads arguing positions that lack evidence and/or contain contradictions won't be promoted. The thread proposal process exists to remove these kinds of problems before discussion begins. You can continue to argue issues I haven't raised, but until you address the issues I have raised your thread cannot be promoted. Here's a cut-n-paste of the questions from my previous message: The thread proposal process cannot go on indefinitely. If my concerns aren't begun to be addressed soon then I'll have to consider closing this proposal.AbE: I see now that you posted three replies, not just the one. I'm looking at the other replies now.Edited by Admin, : AbE.

Hi Kofh2u,You seem to have misunderstood me. I was pointing out a logical error. Let me state it differently.You originally claimed that the giants of the Bible were Homo erectus. You later claimed through a diagram that Adah and Methuslelah were Homo erectus (the Homo egaster distinction is irrelevant to the logical contradiction). So if the giants of the Bible were a different species than Adah and Methuslelah, how can they all be Homo erectus?But the bigger problem is that you have not presented any evidence connecting the personages and beings of the Bible to specific ancestral hominid species. Until you give some indication that your position has at least some supporting evidence your proposal cannot be promoted.

Hi Kofh2u,This is going on too long, so let's keep this simple by focusing on just one hominid from your diagram: Please present your evidence that Adam was a Sahelanthropus tchadensis.

Easy...
Science and the Bible both say that the first evolution from apes was the first fo the 22 now extinct species of humans that lead to the three racial stocks that further developed into us, the people living today.Hence, as the best guesses of Paleontogy and Theology, that would be Sahelanthropus tchadensis.Sahelanthropus tchadensis | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
Sahelanthropus tchadensis is one of the oldest known species in the human family tree. This species lived sometime between 7 and 6 million years ago in West-Central Africa (Chad).

?
1) The proper spelling is Ergaster, not egaster.2) The chart identified Homo ergaster as the partner in a hybridization with the more advanced Modern Homo erectus.This sounds very very reasonable, in that these two DIFFERENT species where closely related, in fact Ergaster is often referred to a African Homo erectus, from which a more advance Modern Asian Homo erectus was derived.You seem to be having difficult with the facts as presented and perhaps are a little behind in your Paleontology, so maybe you ought stop the inquisition and just let others who may be way more knowledgeable in these things debate and inquire of me on a less bias attempt to find so picayune inconsistency in what I set forth???

Hi Kofh2u,We don't seem to be making any progress so I'm going to close this thread proposal.

Thread copied to the Kof2hu's 22 species corresponding to Genesis thread thread in the Free For All forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.