I think it's been a good run for discussions regarding the Garden of Eden and Noah's flood being allegory, but I think it's time to advance beyond the tiring discussions of "yown can mean an era" and " the flood was local" which we are spinning wheels on presently and get into the literal veracity of Nimrod's story.
I think it is best if creationists ar made to visit the subject alongside the Ark mythos and magic tree business.
So, i suppose my question is, when are we going to operate on the premise that the discussion is over regarding the first two narratives and stop giving creos the floor to discuss that which is settled and move on to addressing literal claims on how language was diversified according to the bible?
™ Version 4.2