Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A God Equation
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


(2)
Message 8 of 27 (694633)
03-26-2013 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by GrimSqueaker
03-25-2013 7:44 AM


I don't get it
GrimSqueaker writes:
Now with those parameters set let's set up phase two,
X is greater than Y
X is equal to X and nothing else
In order for X to exist nothing can be equal to or greater than X
Y has a value greater than zero
And the proof;
X + Y > X
I don't get it. So what? Which premise is broken?
X is still greater than Y.
X is still equal to X and nothing else.
There is still nothing that exists that is equal to or greater than X
Y still has a value greater than zero.
Let me give you an example.
We have a really big apple (say, 10 lbs). And a smaller apple (say, 2 lbs).
Lets claim that the big apple is the biggest and nothing is bigger.
Proof:
10 + 2 > 10
So what?
Yes.. 12 lbs is greater than 10 lbs.
But... our 10 lbs apple is still the biggest.
There is no 12 lbs apple. All we've done is some simple addition... that doesn't contradict any of our original parameters.
All you've done is say that God + stuff is more than "just God".
Which is true.
But there's still nothing else that is "larger than God" on it's own. God is still the greatest, the most powerful, the biggest... the "most" of whatever it is you're talking about.
Your proof doesn't contradict any of your original premises or parameters. Therefore, you haven't contradicted anything.
All you've done is some simple addition.
I don't think God or the Bible ever implied that addition was impossible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GrimSqueaker, posted 03-25-2013 7:44 AM GrimSqueaker has not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 21 of 27 (694837)
03-29-2013 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by NoNukes
03-29-2013 10:33 AM


Aren't Friday's Always Good?
NoNukes writes:
Is coloical a typo? I cannot find this word in the dictionary.
I believe he meant "colloquial."
Which is kind of the same sense as "laymen's terms" or "chatting with buddies" (I think... english is not me best sport).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by NoNukes, posted 03-29-2013 10:33 AM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 03-29-2013 2:31 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024