Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,418 Year: 3,675/9,624 Month: 546/974 Week: 159/276 Day: 33/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Dinosaurs live with man?
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3988 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 106 of 373 (695690)
04-08-2013 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by GrimSqueaker
03-19-2013 8:55 AM


No, the case here is much stronger than that for reality of elves, hobbits and goblins. The dragon stories and descriptions are very similar and universal. Most dragon legends are about actual fighting the demonized beasts and it is a well known habit of the devious simian to over-demonise the enemies it massacres or wipes out completely, says the feline.
In any case the moggy would not bet heavily on the consenting quackademics getting anything right.
Like Fred Hoyle rightly noted, the overall mechanism of evolution proposed by the neo-darwinian quacks is certainly nonsense of a very high order. There is no reason therefore to expect the dinosaur bit of it to be anything sensible.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by GrimSqueaker, posted 03-19-2013 8:55 AM GrimSqueaker has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-08-2013 6:46 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied
 Message 109 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 7:05 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 107 of 373 (695691)
04-08-2013 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 6:44 PM


I thought you were only obsessively wrong about physics. It's nice to see you branching out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 6:44 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 6:53 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3988 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 108 of 373 (695692)
04-08-2013 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Dr Adequate
04-08-2013 6:46 PM


I am neither right nor wrong, Inadequate. I just don't share your creationist bigbangist beliefs.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-08-2013 6:46 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-08-2013 7:25 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2127 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 109 of 373 (695693)
04-08-2013 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 6:44 PM


No, the case here is much stronger than that for reality of elves, hobbits and goblins. The dragon stories and descriptions are very similar and universal. Most dragon legends are about actual fighting the demonized beasts and it is a well known habit of the devious simian to over-demonise the enemies it massacres or wipes out completely, says the feline.
Where are the bones?
We have bones from everything back to early dinosaurs, but no dragon bones.
Where are the dragon bones?

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 6:44 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 8:20 PM Coyote has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 110 of 373 (695694)
04-08-2013 7:25 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 6:53 PM


I am neither right nor wrong, Inadequate. I just don't share your creationist bigbangist beliefs.
I already knew you don't know what "creationist" means, so there's nothing new to laugh at there. That's disappointing. On the other hand, it seems that you're now setting your sights on the Law Of The Excluded Middle. This could be fun to watch.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 6:53 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-09-2013 9:56 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3988 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 111 of 373 (695696)
04-08-2013 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Coyote
04-08-2013 7:05 PM


Some claim the Chinese are finding loads of dragon bones and stuff. Others say Dawkins and his gang collect the bones and now they are all hidden up his arse. They say he hides them there in order not to lose face in a debate with the intelligent designers. I don't know as I did not double-check on either claim.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 7:05 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Percy, posted 04-08-2013 8:35 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied
 Message 113 by hooah212002, posted 04-08-2013 9:11 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied
 Message 114 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 10:21 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied
 Message 115 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-08-2013 10:22 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 112 of 373 (695697)
04-08-2013 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 8:20 PM


Alfred Maddenstein writes:
Some claim the Chinese are finding loads of dragon bones and stuff.
I think you're mistaken. I have it on good authority from a swami that they're finding griffin, minotaur and unicorn bones and stuff.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 8:20 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 113 of 373 (695699)
04-08-2013 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 8:20 PM


Some say that Harry is really a Hufflepuff and Slytherin destroyed the ring, but a Dovahkiin shouted it back into existence.
Some say that elves are truly men and men are truly dwarves.
Some have even went so far as to say we are all actually White Walkers and Kirkwall houses the One True King.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 8:20 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2127 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 114 of 373 (695705)
04-08-2013 10:21 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 8:20 PM


Still no dragon bones
Some claim the Chinese are finding loads of dragon bones and stuff.
If you were to do a simple web search you would find that "dragon bones" is a term the Chinese use to describe any fossil. They use them in herbal medicines.
There are no real dragon bones found by paleontologists. Dragons are imaginary creatures, much like hobbits, elves, and deities.
Others say Dawkins and his gang collect the bones and now they are all hidden up his arse. They say he hides them there in order not to lose face in a debate with the intelligent designers. I don't know as I did not double-check on either claim.
Your crudity says far more about you than it does about Dawkins.
How can you expect anyone to take what you say seriously when that is the apex of your discussion?

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 8:20 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by hooah212002, posted 04-08-2013 10:23 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied
 Message 117 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 11:01 PM Coyote has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 115 of 373 (695706)
04-08-2013 10:22 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 8:20 PM


Some claim the Chinese are finding loads of dragon bones and stuff. Others say Dawkins and his gang collect the bones and now they are all hidden up his arse. They say he hides them there in order not to lose face in a debate with the intelligent designers. I don't know as I did not double-check on either claim.
Does it worry you at all that this is the most sensible and coherent thing you've posted?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 8:20 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 116 of 373 (695707)
04-08-2013 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Coyote
04-08-2013 10:21 PM


Re: Still no dragon bones
How can you expect anyone to take what you say seriously when that is the apex of your discussion?
He refers to himself as a cat. I don't think he was ever interested in anyone taking him seriously.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 10:21 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3988 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 117 of 373 (695718)
04-08-2013 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Coyote
04-08-2013 10:21 PM


Re: Still no dragon bones
Coy, for you a good web search might be a basis enough to believe or disbelieve anything. This is a religious approach. The cat is more scientifically inclined than that. His own or any one else's beliefs and assertions about anything do not bother him in the least. They are irrelevant in science. He needs to understand whether something is possible or not. In this case both claims are possible ones. It could be that the Chinese lie about the bones and it would not surprise anybody if the palaeontologists do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 10:21 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 11:25 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2127 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 118 of 373 (695720)
04-08-2013 11:25 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-08-2013 11:01 PM


Re: Still no dragon bones
Coy, for you a good web search might be a basis enough to believe or disbelieve anything. This is a religious approach. The cat is more scientifically inclined than that.
Well, I have a little more than a web search to go on. Half my Ph.D. training was in the field of fossil man and human osteology, but it included a lot of mammalian osteology as well. I get calls about once a month to help the local Coroner identify bones, and we are always digging up bones of all sorts. Got some grizzly bear bones a couple of weeks ago. So I''m not exactly unfamiliar with the subject of osteology—as you seem to be.
His own [the cat's] or any one else's beliefs and assertions about anything do not bother him in the least. They are irrelevant in science.
Beliefs and assertions are rubbish, but science has evidence and that is relevant in science. And that evidence is that there are no dragon bones! You don't believe it, all you have to do is produce evidence that there are. And you better make it good, as you are going against the informed opinions and evidence of tens of thousands of experts.
He needs to understand whether something is possible or not. In this case both claims are possible ones. It could be that the Chinese lie about the bones and it would not surprise anybody if the palaeontologists do.
"Possible" is a nonsense claim. Let's stick to evidence instead. Elves, leprechauns, unicorns, and trolls are "possible" if you stretch the term, but of those critters the only one we have evidence for is trolls (this thread is proof positive that they exist).

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-08-2013 11:01 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-08-2013 11:39 PM Coyote has replied
 Message 121 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-09-2013 9:00 AM Coyote has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 373 (695723)
04-08-2013 11:39 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Coyote
04-08-2013 11:25 PM


Re: Still no dragon bones
So I trace your posts back and I see it stems from the question of 'where are the dragon bones?"
Don't you think the ancient Chinese found dinosaur fossils too, and that's where the dragon legends come from?
Like I was talking about with the cyclops in Message 10?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Coyote, posted 04-08-2013 11:25 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Coyote, posted 04-09-2013 12:05 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2127 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 120 of 373 (695726)
04-09-2013 12:05 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by New Cat's Eye
04-08-2013 11:39 PM


Re: Still no dragon bones
Sure!
The Chinese have a long tradition of "dragon" bones. They are just fossils.
Some of the Gigantopithecus teeth were found in Chinese herbal shops, if I remember correctly.
But that doesn't make them dragons.
If there were really dragons running around at about any time in the past we should have found bones or fossils. We haven't.
Ergo, they didn't exist. More creationist wishful thinking.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-08-2013 11:39 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024