Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is nuclear power safe??
Taq
Member
Posts: 10038
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


(1)
Message 53 of 57 (696048)
04-11-2013 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by ViperAce
04-10-2013 8:56 PM


From what I know, nuclear power sounds like a good option. It has potential for life threatening accidents but if used properly it generates a lot of cost effective energy and creates very little greenhouse gas emissions, the main form of pollution that is a red flag for fossil fuel based energy.
It does generate harmful waste but this might be a good tradeoff compared to greenhouse gas emissions. If nuclear energy did become the dominate form of energy generation, a lot of work would have to be done in managing this waste.
From what I have read and understood, new technology could make reactors much safer and they would also be able to use recycled nuclear waste which would cut down on the total radiation that has to be stored long term. For example, the design of pebble bed reactors makes meltdowns impossible. If the temperature gets too high the nuclear fission reactions shut down all on their own.
Pebble-bed reactor - Wikipedia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by ViperAce, posted 04-10-2013 8:56 PM ViperAce has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Rahvin, posted 04-11-2013 1:54 PM Taq has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10038
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 55 of 57 (696059)
04-11-2013 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Rahvin
04-11-2013 1:54 PM


How about a molten salt reactor?
Molten salt reactor - Wikipedia
Or using Thorium instead of Uranium/Plutnium?
Thorium fuel cycle - Wikipedia
Those are also great options. It is sad that we are still using 50 year old reactor technology.
The state of nuclear power generation is hobbled not by the laws of physics or the lack of capability, but solely by political nonsense spawning from irrational fear over the objectively safest power generation source currently known to man.
Exactly. I think it is part of human psychology to fear the unseen and unfamiliar more than the threats you can see and do understand. For example, people freak out about what are really low levels of radiation while living in a city with very unhealthy smog levels. If people really knew the amount of radiation that granite countertops can pump out I wonder what they would do?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Rahvin, posted 04-11-2013 1:54 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Pressie, posted 04-11-2013 3:56 PM Taq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024