Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8897 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-19-2019 3:56 AM
137 online now:
CosmicChimp, Tangle (2 members, 135 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,449 Year: 3,486/19,786 Month: 481/1,087 Week: 71/212 Day: 1/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
RewPrev1
...
1314
15
1617
...
25NextFF
Author Topic:   Did Dinosaurs live with man?
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 2040 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 211 of 373 (696972)
04-19-2013 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by Dr Adequate
04-19-2013 10:00 PM


Re: Quoting the Cheshire
Who's talking..Inadequate? Your whole argument so far boils down to insinuations of how mad is the cat and how sane and trustworthy a doc you happen to believe yourself to be. Accompanied by thumping on the baboonish breast and patting Coy Boy's baboonish back.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-19-2013 10:00 PM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-19-2013 10:55 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 179 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 212 of 373 (696973)
04-19-2013 10:44 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-19-2013 10:09 PM


Re: Laughing at the Cheshire
If the figurines are genuine, they alone are enough to put a nuclear winter on your whole dogma, Coy Boy.

They aren't genuine, so don't overly concern yourself.

Yet they are but a single such funny bit of information out of very many.

They are typical of the arguments made by creationists, and yourself.

You are grasping at any hint of support for your claims, while disregarding the massive amounts of evidence that disprove your claims.

That's not science.

Well, maybe creation "science."

More like religious apologetics: "We'll believe anything that supports our position and deny anything that doesn't."

Get a grip!


Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein

How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein

It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers


This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-19-2013 10:09 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-20-2013 12:47 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16085
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 10.0


(1)
Message 213 of 373 (696974)
04-19-2013 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-19-2013 10:16 PM


Re: Quoting the Cheshire
Who's talking..Inadequate? Your whole argument so far boils down to insinuations of how mad is the cat and how sane and trustworthy a doc you happen to believe yourself to be. Accompanied by thumping on the baboonish breast and patting Coy Boy's baboonish back.

In the first place, that is of course not true, in the second place, those weren't insinuations, and in the third place --- you are still not a cat.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-19-2013 10:16 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not yet responded

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 2040 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 214 of 373 (696983)
04-20-2013 12:47 AM
Reply to: Message 212 by Coyote
04-19-2013 10:44 PM


Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
Again, you worry too much about the bible peddlers. If it is established that all you believe in in general and the part about the dragons in particular is sheer quackademic nonsense, that would not necessarily mean that the case of the bible-pushers is made and you need to switch your allegiance to Noah's ark and the rest of the flooding punishment for your baboonish sins and stuff. It only would mean that your dogma is falsified in the Popperian sense. Do you honour Popper, Coy Boy? Just be a good boy, admit you ain't got a remotest clue about nothing and go back to the drawing board and places where clues and stuff could be found. Otherwise being a creationist yourself your calling the bible-pushers and gospel peddlers creationists impresses nobody. Remember, the big bunk creation you believe in while parroting the Hawk, Krauss the Mouse and other venerable quacks is no less laughable than what the bible folks propose. No difference, sorry to disappoint you, Coy Boy.

Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Coyote, posted 04-19-2013 10:44 PM Coyote has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-20-2013 3:14 AM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 215 of 373 (696993)
04-20-2013 3:14 AM
Reply to: Message 214 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-20-2013 12:47 AM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
quackademic nonsense,

That has cured disease and put man on the moon and has allowed us to communicate in this way, yeah that nonsense. Face the facts: it works.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-20-2013 12:47 AM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-22-2013 12:49 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 2040 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 216 of 373 (697138)
04-22-2013 12:49 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by New Cat's Eye
04-20-2013 3:14 AM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
No, no, no Vatican, you are trying to smuggle your religion for a free ride here insinuating to the gullible that because the modern technology self-evidently works and the technology is associated with science anything labelled by the priests and politicians as science must be swallowed without demur. Irrelevant as whatever works would be working just the same without such ridiculous ideologies as bigbangism, neo-darwinism, feminism or climatism labelled as science by popular consent. That is a trick the feline is well familiar with. Performing the trick grants your bollocks their well deserved cutting by the Cheshire with the consequent ramming deep down your devious throat for you to chew and choke at leisure. From the fact that a computer works as it does or surgeons operate as they do may not automatically follow that the whole world can possibly be compressed to occupy the volume less than a pea while embedded in nothing to inflate into. Or that non-living objects can meet by chance to result in a death-dodging machine like you or a cell to randomly mutate into all other forms. The modern technology is not dependent at all on modern myths and mass ideologies propagated by the priestly quacks. Understand?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-20-2013 3:14 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by Coyote, posted 04-22-2013 1:32 AM Alfred Maddenstein has responded
 Message 219 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-22-2013 11:08 AM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 179 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 217 of 373 (697141)
04-22-2013 1:32 AM
Reply to: Message 216 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-22-2013 12:49 AM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
Are you drunk or doped up or what?

Not a word of the nonsense you just posted refutes any piece of evidence that science has produced, and that people have posted for you in this thread.

If all you have is confused nonsensical claims, nobody is going to take you seriously. But that seems to be all you have, and in fact people don't take you seriously.

If you want to advocate your position, why don't you try evidence instead of nonsense?

(Oh, right. You don't have any.)


Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein

How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein

It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers


This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-22-2013 12:49 AM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-22-2013 2:30 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 2040 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 218 of 373 (697146)
04-22-2013 2:30 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by Coyote
04-22-2013 1:32 AM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
Sorry, Coy Boy, if I missed somehow the truckloads of evidence you've got it all down pat allegedly posted. There have been loads of ad hominids and insinuations hurled at the cat but that is only evidence that you lot have got very little to say of any substance on the issue and in general defence of your creationist beliefs. You are just not interested in anything other than giving and maintaining the impression the beliefs are gospel truth set in stone at all costs. That quackademic lack of interest is a shame. Take those Ica Stones and the Acambaro statuettes that the Cheshire investigated. His preliminary conclusion is that in both cases some of them are genuine and some may be fake. Which are fakes and which are not, what exactly the genuine ones were depicting or what exactly was copied in the fakes and so on is hard to establish as no thorough investigation has ever been conducted in either case. The alleged fakers were never even interrogated properly as faking the artefacts was not a crime in either state nor was it a crime against the official archaeological time-line. The quackademics had reached their conclusions before hand being interested only in knowing it all already. If not for the bible-pushers both cases would have been buried completely. The peddlers must be thanked for drawing attention to such matters even though they may have a heavy agenda of their own. You lot, on the other hand, are a total waste of the space occupied by yourselves.

Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by Coyote, posted 04-22-2013 1:32 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 219 of 373 (697183)
04-22-2013 11:08 AM
Reply to: Message 216 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-22-2013 12:49 AM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
Are you retarded? That didn't have anything to do with what I wrote. Your incoherent babbling is purely nonsensical, CrazyJew. No matter how much you obfuscate it, you haven't dealt with the fact that science works.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-22-2013 12:49 AM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-22-2013 6:04 PM New Cat's Eye has responded

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2380
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007


Message 220 of 373 (697207)
04-22-2013 12:32 PM


Mutate and Survive


Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by Coyote, posted 04-22-2013 8:56 PM Granny Magda has not yet responded

    
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 2040 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 221 of 373 (697257)
04-22-2013 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by New Cat's Eye
04-22-2013 11:08 AM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
Science works, whatever works is science is a tautology, silly Vatican. Like the working natural selection and so on. The dead tend to reproduce less than the living kind of stuff. The cat dealt with your particular bollocks so what are you unhappy about?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-22-2013 11:08 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-23-2013 12:10 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 179 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 222 of 373 (697267)
04-22-2013 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 220 by Granny Magda
04-22-2013 12:32 PM


Where are your dragons?
Where are your dragons?

Here's one now!

Catch it quick before it gets away!

Like all the other ones have, eh?

(Dragons existing with man? What a joke!)


Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein

How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein

It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers


This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by Granny Magda, posted 04-22-2013 12:32 PM Granny Magda has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-23-2013 2:49 PM Coyote has not yet responded

  
vimesey
Member
Posts: 932
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011
Member Rating: 6.7


Message 223 of 373 (697296)
04-23-2013 9:21 AM


Plus ca change...
I doodled this in response to some contributions on another thread from our feline visitor. Not a lot changes.

Message 493


Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

    
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 224 of 373 (697306)
04-23-2013 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-22-2013 6:04 PM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
Science works, whatever works is science is a tautology, silly Vatican.

That's right, CrazyJew, and it has cured disease and put man on the moon and has allowed us to communicate in this way.

It totally kicks ass and it gets shit done. You should be thankful that we have been able to utilize it.

But in your arrogant ignorance, instead you denigrate it. This wonderful gift we've received that has done so much good for this world, you deny it because you'd rather believe in dragons.

Pathetic.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-22-2013 6:04 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-23-2013 2:24 PM New Cat's Eye has responded

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 2040 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 225 of 373 (697319)
04-23-2013 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 224 by New Cat's Eye
04-23-2013 12:10 PM


Re: Laughing back at the Coy Boy.
No, no, no, again, Vatican. You again are trying to promote your religion by association with whatever may work. The two are not the same no matter how much you'd love the cat to believe otherwise and swallow under that guise any quackademic pronouncement you bigbanger creationist lot hold for gospel truth set forever in stone. That won't wash here with the feline. The buck stops here so you won't sell any of your creationist snake-oil to the moggy. The cat neither believes nor disbelieves in dragons. The issue discussed here is whether the dragons and dinosaurs are the same phenomenon and the issue is how, when and if they all became extinct and it is clearly far from being any settled science. Understand?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-23-2013 12:10 PM New Cat's Eye has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by Coyote, posted 04-23-2013 2:55 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded
 Message 228 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-23-2013 4:06 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not yet responded

  
RewPrev1
...
1314
15
1617
...
25NextFF
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019