The clearest evidence is, Dogmameat, that nobody ain't got no remotest clue about such matters, least of all the quackademicians with their official version of history simian and universal. All the quackish lot are interested in and obsessed about is proving the bible-pushers wrong. How silly is that? That fanatical lot are fixated on and chained to the bible far more than the bible pushers themselves. Total waste of space. The bible pushers are at least some use for picking holes and exposing contradictions in the idiotic doctrines proposed by the university snake-oil merchants. Could the quacks do that job themselves or they will forever need a nanny?
I'll bet they didn't much like you crapping in a box either.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The clearest evidence is, Dogmameat, that nobody ain't got no remotest clue about such matters, least of all the quackademicians with their official version of history simian and universal. All the quackish lot are interested in and obsessed about is proving the bible-pushers wrong. How silly is that? That fanatical lot are fixated on and chained to the bible far more than the bible pushers themselves. Total waste of space. The bible pushers are at least some use for picking holes and exposing contradictions in the idiotic doctrines proposed by the university snake-oil merchants. Could the quacks do that job themselves or they will forever need a nanny?
And this rant is supposed to convince us that dinosaurs lived with man, or that dragons existed into recent times?
You've become nothing but a troll. And not a very good one at that.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers
Lovely to hear the sneaky little Tanya raising her tiny voice. Got a hypothesis about history of the feline's education, Tanya? Very good, very good. Keep on working on the thesis. The cat was losing hope to ever hear anything from that cheer-leader of the moggy's posts dislikers.
Got a hypothesis about history of the feline's education
Nope, an evidence based hypostesis about the skunk's lack of education.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
Vatican, you, Coy Boy and shy Tanya are deluded. Your bigbanger creationist proposals are nothing like any pretty ex. Who would want to slit the throat of such ugly nonsense? Not the feline. All your ludicrous quackademic doctrines will die an ugly natural death collapsing from accumulating decrepitude. Deal with that.
Your bigbanger creationist proposals are nothing like any pretty ex. Who would want to slit the throat of such ugly nonsense? Not the feline.
But that's bullshit. You *do* want to slit its throat. Since you can't refute it all you can do is doubt it. And that's what you do: you write that nobody knows anything about this when in fact we do. You can't deal with the facts so you resort to obscurity.
All your ludicrous quackademic doctrines will die an ugly natural death collapsing from accumulating decrepitude. Deal with that.
Given the track record of how great it has been working, you know; curing diseases, putting the man on the moon, and allowing us to communicate in this way, the odds of it collapsing are extremely low.
I am sort of glad that you didn't actually shut the fuck up.
We improve the integrity of our knowledge by observing how it resists arguments to the contrary. I just wish that you would actually make an argument instead of merely casting aspersions.
Who are we, Dogmameat? Speak for yourself. What knowledge, silly, do you possess on behalf of all simians, you pretentious midget? The issue of the thread here is whether the simians and dragons have been physically contemporary or not. Your dogma says an emphatic no to that yet there is an overwhelming doubt about your dogma. Understand? There is not anything impossible as such in the contrary proposition. On the other hand, there are physical impossibilities involved in the very foundations of your dogma. Like getting something from nothing every step of the theoretical way and so on. Does the feline need to rub your nose harder in the foundational tenets of your stupid bigbangism and your silly neo-darwinism so that this should penetrate your creationist skull?
I can see that you are trying to be a wit using personal attacks instead of evidence. Keep it up! You're half-way there!
What knowledge, silly, do you possess on behalf of all simians, you pretentious midget? The issue of the thread here is whether the simians and dragons have been physically contemporary or not.
Modern humans and dragons have not been physically contemporary. In all these posts you have provided no evidence to the contrary. You can't even provide a source for bones, which should be all over the place. I've helped excavate both mammoth and mastodon bones, and tens of thousands of smaller bones, but have never in >40 years of digging found dragon bones. Neither has anyone else. If you have evidence to the contrary, why don't you present it?
Your dogma says an emphatic no to that yet there is an overwhelming doubt about your dogma. Understand?
We understand the evidence, which says there is no such thing as a dragon, but we'll leave dogma to you and the rest of the true-believers. There is no place for dogma in science. You, on the other hand, appear to be full of it.
There is not anything impossible as such in the contrary proposition.
Gibberish.
On the other hand, there are physical impossibilities involved in the very foundations of your dogma. Like getting something from nothing every step of the theoretical way and so on. Does the feline need to rub your nose harder in the foundational tenets of your stupid bigbangism and your silly neo-darwinism so that this should penetrate your creationist skull?
Creationist gibberish. (But then that's a redundancy.)
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers
There is a very good evidence that snakes, pigs and monkeys are as mythical as dragons, Coy Boy. They are all part of the Chinese calendar. The calendar is based on pure fantasy therefore no such mythological creatures exist or ever existed.
™ Version 4.2
