|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Did Dinosaurs live with man? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3614 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
That only supports the position that they beleived dragons where real. Not that they existed in their time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3966 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Irrelevant again, Vatican. You again try to smuggle your religion for a free ride at the expense of the technology that has nothing to do with your faith. Enlighten the public curing of which disease exactly depends on the moronic concept of expanding universe you have to profess a firm belief in lest your jeopardise your quackademic career?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 284 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
So, still no dragons?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3966 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
That would mean that the Chinese mixed genres, Beanie. That is, mixed animal husbandry and palaeontology like Sagan and Adrienne Mayor claim they did and were much better at both than Coy Boy and his buddies. The Chinese point to what Coy Boy calls dinosaur fossils calling all that dragon bones. It might be though that Coy Boy just got all his chronology totally skewed from his buddies while the Chinese were happily riding domesticated dragons and stuff. You never know. The feline would not bet on Coy Boy guessing anything right, you know.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 284 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
And the dragons? Where are they?
C'mon, take a little time out of your busy schedule of posting halfwitted nonsense on the internet, and find us just one teensy-weensy dragon.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3966 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
La-la-la, look at that learned Inadequate. He is such a rare erudite. So certain of his sixty-five million years gap chronology. But you know what? 65 million years is a long, long distance. It might be that from that distance not a single discernible trace is left but all is completely recycled by mother nature.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmafood Member (Idle past 348 days) Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined:
|
Prototypical writes: We improve the integrity of our knowledge by observing how it resists arguments to the contrary. Alfred writes: Who are we, Dogmameat? Speak for yourself. Oh I meant rational people. What method are you using to improve the integrity of your knowledge? I don't think that it is working.
Alfred writes: The issue of the thread here is whether the simians and dragons have been physically contemporary or not. No Alfred. This issue is whether people and dinosaurs were contemporary. It has been explained that there were and are some dinosaurs that coexist(ed) with people. We call them birds now. Not a fire breather amongst the lot of them.
Al writes: Your dogma says an emphatic no to that yet there is an overwhelming doubt about your dogma. Understand? Apparently you are one of the few who is overwhelmed by the evidence for dragons provided by your local Chinese food restaurant menu calendars. (Free clue ---> not a great source for paleontological information.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3966 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
You prevaricate, Dogmameat. The Cheshire is not impressed. Dinosaur is just a new-fangled name for the kind known as dragons since time immemorial to all simians of reason and learning. Birds are birds and dragons are dragons again. Herodotus and others describe how a smaller type of flying dragon is hunted by a kind of bird - the ibis. He does not say their fight is a fight of two types of dinosaur. Crocodiles might be an extant sub kind of dragon but the birds are not dragons at all other than inside of the framework of your religion. Understand? If not educate yourself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3966 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
And what is the point of inventing new names for old stuff like dinosaur for dragon? To patronise the ancient simians, to vainly declare them stupid, to feel important at their expense, to feel sure the modern monkey is making a great progress in understanding and so on. Progress, my foot. Hilarious.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member
|
The topic is "Did Dinosaurs live with man?".
You say that dinosaurs might have, and that they could have spawned the legends of dragons. We point out that there are not dinosaur bones, as opposed to fossilized material, so they can't be contemporary with man. Your response is to deny that we know anything about it at all and that anything is possible. Well whoop de-fucking-doo! Just face the facts, CrazyJew. Science won the debate decades ago. Denying reality and thinking wishfully only make you a fool.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 284 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
La-la-la, look at that learned Inadequate. He is such a rare erudite. So certain of his sixty-five million years gap chronology. But you know what? 65 million years is a long, long distance. It might be that from that distance not a single discernible trace is left but all is completely recycled by mother nature. I notice nothing in that stream of semi-consciousness was a dragon. Or evidence for dragons. Let us know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3614 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
Im not mixing anything. Dragons meant a lot too these people so they believed they where real. Thats why they appear in the calendar. Its really that simple.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 284 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Dinosaur is just a new-fangled name for the kind known as dragons since time immemorial to all simians of reason and learning. Really? Please identify the species of dinosaur shown below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3966 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
What do you mean by the cat's denying you know anything about anything at all? You mean anything past? Well, there are serious doubts about all your certainties even about relatively recent past. Your quackademic ilk asserts that very recent war propaganda myths are the gospel truth and you do it with the brazen mug and lip. And you have the gall to insinuate your account of dragons is to be taken at face value too? Keep your chutzpah in check, Vatican.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmafood Member (Idle past 348 days) Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: |
You prevaricate... Alfred, you sister fondling troglodyte. You have Van Gough's ear for the truth and Helen Keller's eye for detail. Your momma failed to teach you that those who have much to be modest about should be modest. Trumpeting your ignorance only makes you look ignorant. Fear not. There is nothing wrong with you that a bit of reincarnation wont fix.
Knilige of Dogma What is that exactly? A letter jumble for 'I'm like dragon'? Or is it your honorary title back at the cave?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024