Is The Fossil Record an indication of Evolution?

Imo, there ought to be millions, if not billions of transitionals -- so many that it would be without question.

quote:

---

Alright Buz, I give up - why should there be billions of transitionals?

---

Because it would take uncountable billions of transitionals to evolve everything from slime to sublime.

quote:

---

Every fossil is a transitional, if you look at it correctly.

---

Eh, yah, but how about some billions more of the macros to balance out the micros?

quote:

---

Hey buzsaw, lets try not to use Micro and Macro terminology. The understanding of how micro became macro is a big problem currently in my mind.

---

I wasn't aware that micro ever became macro?? Anyhow, I'm sure Crashy, to whom I was responding understands what I mean.

quote:

---

It's hard to understand what you meant, exactly, as I'm not sure why you would draw a distinction between a "macro"-transitional fossil and a "micro"-transitional fossil. Fossils are both.

---

My point was not to distinguish between them, but that there needs be more of a balance in the fossil record with a greater quantity of Macro fossils than exists.