What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ?

Hi CrazyDiamond7,I only read the first few paragraphs of your thread proposal. While other moderators might feel differently, it looks pretty crazy to me. If you can respond to this message with a brief description of around a hundred words of what you'd like to discuss, and if it doesn't sound too crazy, then I might give your thread proposal a read.About this writing entitled Written on the outside and Sealed Within, we can't have a discussion of writings where only you have a copy. Did you write this yourself? Can you post it on the web somewhere?Your second post only reinforced an impression of incoherency.

CD, please post something I can understand that makes sense. This isn't a negotiation. If I don't understand it I won't promote it.

Could you supply the evidence for the existence of the "emanation of living light"?

This is nonsense. If you have no evidence for "the emanation of living light" then please stop wasting my time.

If you want this in the science forums, then you need to offer some tangible evidence of this living light or living energy. If "living energy" exists then there must be a means of detecting it. Where is the "living energy" measurement device? Where are the records of experiments that trace the path of living energy out of the body and on to its destination after death?In other words, where is the evidence that this isn't just all in your imagination.

If you can describe the Genesis Experiment maybe it would help get this promoted. No promises.

Thread copied here from the Why not see when a theory becomes obsolete thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

I promoted this to Free For All because I was unable to make any sense of CD's proposed topic, but maybe others understand it better. I think an effort should be made to help clarify what CD is trying to say.