Hollow Earth Expedition?

I remember seeing ads in Popular Mechanics in the early 1960's selling books about Admiral Byrd's flight over the North Pole hole, the entrance to the hollow earth. We've come a long way since then - the Internet has brought us unlimited free nonsense.Edited by ringo, : Speling.

Yes, I have. Since I was a kid, it's been a point of honour among my cousins to do it. You're in for a lot of ribbing if you can't. There are lots of other projections besides Mercator that are accurate. All you'd have to do to really test the idea is to get an accurate map, say a sinusoidal projection with interuptions (much like an orange peel), cut out the continents and scotch-tape them together by the edges.I've looked at your video and it's far from convincing. When two coastlines come close together, they are rotated out of view before you can see how well they fit. When they come around again, they fit miraculously but you can't tell if there's any overlap.(The Mediterranean Sea is one obvious example that isn't explained by simple expansion.)

It's been done, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in When the World Screamed.

The "answers" you are spouting are not from the KJV; they're from creationist websites.

That's how science works. It isn't just throwing out ideas; it's about testing ideas. It's more useful to ask what's wrong with an idea than to just say, "Look at all the ideas!" I'd say that the one who'd trying to overthrow well-tested ideas is the one who's "looking for conflict".

What people are doing is pointing out the errors in your ideas. Again, the reason is to point out the errors in your thinking. To be able to say that, you must be quite an authority on creationist websites.Edited by ringo, : Removed superfluity.

You can't correct silence.