Morality without god

He seems not to have any sources. If he did he would present them. Find a historian that supports this view and I will look at it. It seems you Bennett is the only person proposing this.

You have not presented any histories that you are aware. People just spouting crap is not a history. Neither you, nor your fave revisionist, Bennett, have presented any sources to back any claim.

Then tell me his sources. I am not going to listen to his crap. Tell me the historians and I will review their work. Delusions and paranoia are signs of some deep issues. Just because he is a protestant does not make everything he claims true or real.

In other words you and he have no sources. Typical and nor surprising. You will believe anything that is anti-catholic.I am an atheist , so I don't care on religious grounds, but as I have some training in history and archival science I get incensed when people pervert history in order to back their views.Until you and Bennett can provide actual sources and actual historians that support this crap it is just crap. Any of them by actual historians? Trust me. I ain't ever going to go there. Your hate colors your ability to see things rationally. Why? Because it confirms your worldview?

Faith provide me with historians names that support your view. I have provided two scholarly works saying that you and Bennett are full of shit. I know this is hard for you to believe but your blog has no authority.Give me names of historians and their works. I am very willing to prevent dissenting views. There is some historical research in which
I very much taken a dissenting view. This has not been driven by any world view, but solely by the evidence.No I will not go to your blog. If you want to be taken seriously here, present your support here.

Ok curiosity got the best to me and I went to your blog where you claimed there were books listed that supported your arguments about St. Patrick.Faith it isn't good to lie. There are no books about Patrick at all on your website.But lets look at the books and see if any are even written by historians.First
RULERS OF EVIL, F Tupper Saussy
Not a historian but an artist and musician.Next
Washington in the Lap of Rome, J D Fulton
Not much about this guy

quote:

---

The Rev. Dr. Justln Dewey Fulton, for many years prominent as a Baptist minister in Brooklyn, and who attracted great attention by his vehement crusade against the Roman Catholic Church, died at his home here to-day of paralysis.

---

More
Self published. 1888
Next
Ok this is getting tiring
Paul Serup (Who Killed Lincoln)
Not a historian. He is an independent researcher". Also, the book is self-published. John Dowling History of Romanism
Published 1871
Not a historian.Alright I have to stop this is too painful.
Nothing about Patrick, nothing by any historian.I am dumber for even looking at this sensationalistic garbage.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Well that confirms you have no support for those arguments. If you did you would have presented it. What a waste because they got it all wrong. They manipulated the info in order to try to support their premise. Sort of like a creationist. I suppose you think there is some sort of conspiracy since no real historian supports them. No. That is why they had to self publish. Though history is one of the soft sciences, there is still a process of peer review for scholarly writings. Publishing companies also try to some extent make sure arguments presented stand up to historical review. None of these do.You obviously have no idea what the word "credentials" means. Your comments are insulting and demeaning to historians that are degreed and have spent years studying the process as well as the subject matter.

Yes.
Tremont Temple is the Baptist church where he was the pastor. Never claimed that all were.Henry T Hudson's Papal Power
Published by Trinity Foundation. Basically published by a church. Can find nothing about authors credentials Enough said. Chick has been publishing lies for years. I don't think so. I think people are getting a good view of your "christian" morality as opposed to my atheist morality.I find no reason to lie or rely on liars to support my views.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Surprising how IIRC is not evidence. I think the problem is that you have no idea how to do even basic research. Read and weep

quote:

---

But his biographer, Dr. Justin D. Fulton, who was Pastor of the Tremont Temple Baptist Church from about 1863 to 1873..

---

Which means nothing. What are the degrees in? It seems he has not written anything that would be remotely scholarly. Yes all of them seem to be from vanity press publishers. Can't confirm Whitest Blue publishers as there seems to be nothing about them. But the rest all are.Amazon will sell any book. It is not a mark of quality. This SPLC lists them as a hate group. Nuff said.
SourceEdited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Bill O'Reilly?
Really?
Your claim to fame is that you are more reputable than Bill O'Reilly?
Bill is a liar and everyone knows that.Also, pointing out that historians have issues with their research is not in any way an indication that anything you wrote is correct. You sound like a creationist attacking evolution, thinking that attacking evolution in any way gives any support to creationism. Show the errors these historians made. You are making pretty strong assertions, back them up. Please provide the full review or a link to the review. Their website has nothing and I can not find it for sale on the website. You are making some impressive claims here, I'd like to see some back up. Show us it is for sale at the bookstore. Provide the source that shows this.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

No
I have no desire to contribute anything substantive to a thread you made personal.My response is not to you it is to Paul Serup.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Well he can respond in your thread. I am sure he is a smart man, he can figure it out.