|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 50 (9225 total) |
| |
Malinda Millings | |
Total: 921,151 Year: 1,473/6,935 Month: 236/518 Week: 3/73 Day: 0/3 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The cosmic conspiracy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
justatruthseeker Member (Idle past 3530 days) Posts: 117 From: Tulsa, OK, USA Joined: |
quote: Apparently you don't know much about space.spacetoday.net: ISS radiation shielding not as good as hoped quote: Probably why it didn't work as expected, you understand it so little and think it is electrically neutral despite the fact that craft entering space immediately build up charge. NASA knows it exists, why don't you?Bad request! Space Weather http://srag-nt.jsc.nasa.gov/SpaceRadiation/How/How.cfm NASA - A New Technique to Protect Astronauts from Space Radiation What a Space Suit Does - Spacesuit Capabilities | HowStuffWorks
quote: You seem to be ignoring that 99% of the universe again, as usual. Edited by Admin, : Fix subtitle.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
justatruthseeker Member (Idle past 3530 days) Posts: 117 From: Tulsa, OK, USA Joined:
|
No, a singularity is nothing more than a pinch in the plasma current streams. What you like to call dark matter.
http://visservices.sdsc.edu/...o/images/dark_s_018000001.jpg Z-pinch - WikipediaPinch (plasma physics) - Wikipedia This is why you observe electromagnetic radiation being emitted.
quote: As well as plasma being accelerated along the current pathways.Particle accelerator - Wikipedia Despite your claims of a black hole that does it. It is that 99% mainstream constantly ignores. It is not dust and hot gas out there. It is Plasma, the first state of matter, an electrically active medium. Not that I necessarily agree or disagree with a BB hypothesis, but even it claims that Plasma was the very first form of matter. Electrically charged and highly conductive. Only 1% has formed into solids, liquids and gasses. Yet this 1% is what mainstream bases the other 99% on, then wonder why they need Fairie Dust to explain the 99% they treat the same in their math as the 1% of electrically balanced matter. Edited by justatruthseeker, : No reason given. Edited by justatruthseeker, : No reason given. Edited by justatruthseeker, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 4180 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
No, a singularity is nothing more than a pinch in the plasma current streams. What you like to call dark matter.
I see the Singularity as that place we might imagine as the center of the universe where all matter would collect if we reversed the BB experience and returned along the same trajectories from whence the present matter originated in the great expansion we call the Big Bang.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 528 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
quote: Apparently you don't know much about space.spacetoday.net: ISS radiation shielding not as good as hoped quote: Probably why it didn't work as expected, you understand it so little and think it is electrically neutral despite the fact that craft entering space immediately build up charge. NASA knows it exists, why don't you? It's always amusing when an Internet nutcase posts a quote from a source that falsifies his claim. Your reference speaks of the shielding of the space station itself. There is no mention of a shielded room in which the astronauts could take cover. There are no such shielded rooms. If there were such shielded rooms and there was as much radiation as your fantasy requires, they wouldn't be able to leave the shielded room. Ever. Not even to transfer to a returning spacecraft. There is a section built by the Russians that is more heavily built than the rest of the station, and crews take refuge in there when there is a big flare. But you forget that the radiation Dr. Bridgman calculated would be present all the time. Nobody could live on the station in that environment. Nobody could take spacewalks in that environment. There is radiation in space. There is nowhere near as much radiation in space as would be required to power an electric sun. Dr Bridgman has demonstrated that the radiation exposure just outside the space station would be more than 9,100,000 mSv/day, most likely much much more. Your quote says the astronauts are being exposed to around 1 mSv/day. Either the space station shielding is already working better than any shielding anywhere else, or the solar capacitor electric sun model is false.
quote: You seem to be ignoring that 99% of the universe again, as usual You are ignoring your own fantasy. If your fantasy is correct, at periods of low solar activity the exposure just outside the space station and the astronaut's suit would be more than 9,100,000 mSv/day, most likely much much more. If an astronaut took a spacewalk into that environment, he/she would be dead almost immediately. Astronauts take spacewalks and do not die almost immediately. Therefore the solar capacitor electric sun model is false. Your fantasy requires that the radiation in the near-Earth space environment be many orders of magnitude greater than we have measured. Your fantasy is falsified by observations. (P.S. If you don't like Dr. Bridgman's calculations, I'll be glad to evaluate yours.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
justatruthseeker Member (Idle past 3530 days) Posts: 117 From: Tulsa, OK, USA Joined: |
And yet you claim the residual energy from the BB is keeping the universe at a constant 2.7K and then want me to believe the universe is electrically neutral.
Your very own science tells you plasma is a distinct state of matter and does not behave like solids, liquids or gasses. But then you go right ahead and treat it as nothing more than a solid, liquid or gas in the math. I am still waiting for your reasoning behind violating your own science? Did you ever consider that if they started treating plasma like the distinct state of matter they claim it to be, the math might work out and you might not need to include Fairie Dust to kludge your theories? Every single solar model you had was falsified by Voyager, IBEX and THEMIS missions, yet you expect me to believe those theories are alive and well? I fail to see your justification for the correctness of those models all proved incorrect? On what basic model are you relying on of what the sun is, or how it or the universe behaves? They have all been falsified, every single one. The magnetic field did not change directions, the cosmic rays are all coming preferentially from one direction, , solar convection is 99 orders of magnitude too slow, the solar wind slowed to a stop at the heliospheric boundry, after accelerating out past the orbit of Jupiter. Every expectation you had was falsified by direct observation and measurements. This just of the sun. Mainstream can't even get the star 1 AU away from us correct, and I am to believe they understand things billions of light years away where we can never measure them? What fantasy land do you live in? Your solar model has been falsified, which in turn falsifies your supernova theory, which falsifies your expansion theory. Convection on the sun falsified your thermonuclear model and your magnetic reconnection theory you wanted to use to explain the measured electric currents. These falsify your star formation theories which in turn falsifies your galactic formation models which falsifies your BB. You currently have NO working models to rely on, every one has been falsified by direct observations and experiments. But the biggest blunder is mainstreams insistence that plasma is a distinct state of matter that does not behave like solids, liquids and gasses. Then they go right head and treat it in the math as nothing more than those very solids, liquids and gasses they insist it acts nothing like. How do you justify this hypocricy by mainstream? How do you justify your Fairie Dust when you are violating your own science to uphold it? Edited by justatruthseeker, : spelling
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 23273 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
Instead of just repeating yourself, I think you need to explain how you can maintain your position in the face of all the evidence of gross error, misinformation and misunderstanding on your part.
Refusing to budge from one's position is no great achievement. In this you achieved as much as the flat-earthers. Congratulations. The challenge is to build a rational and coherent position based upon evidence that others will find convincing and compelling. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1160 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
diverMike1974 writes: the wave like massless photons would have had to of traveled at nearly six times the speed of light for nearly 14 billion years Can't you ride a gravity wave which will allow you to travel faster than light?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8731 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
No. Gravity waves are too slow. They only travel at the speed of light.
Some years ago some scientists built a spaceship, SOTI as I recall, that could travel many thousands of times the speed of light. One guy traveled out to edge of the universe where he encountered what he called a wall of bathroom tissue. Funny thing is every time he tried to head into it he found himself heading back into the universe but at the exact opposite end of the universe from where he started. Or so the story goes. Anyway, for some reason SOTI has been taken out of service. As far as I'm aware she hasn't flown since the series ended.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025