I wouldn't say 180degrees though,
I would. The difference is evidence vs. belief, dogma, scripture, divine revelation, etc.
The audience for in ancient times required less information and more instruction. I can admit that their proposed facts are significantly more vague statements e.g. "god created the heavens and the earth" or "multiply according to their kinds'' seen in the Torah and Bible, even that requires assumptions and inferences.
Irrelevant.
Science also relies on Belief, (scientific) Scripture, dogma, revelation (Primordial soup became us).
False. You clearly do not know how science works, and seem to be attacking it for religious reasons. It seems as if the more doubt you can create in your own mind about science, the more faith you can have in your unevidenced religious beliefs.
The Jewish lineage is alive today and their account is too, the arabic people are around, so is there historical artifacts... there has to be evidence in order to substantiate your belief otherwise why would anyone believe it?
Irrelevant.
Wars yes, however Hitler's war was based on (race issues among others) Slavery in the US led to segregation, and revolt, additionally, there were countless land grab wars... currently there is violent strike action because of money. Wars are not specific to religious beliefs.
Irrelevant.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers
™ Version 4.2
