Ra3MaN writes:
I understand. Many people, including myself have personal experience, which may not convince you, but it really convinced me.
You asked how one would scientifically prove the existence of spirits, and I told you. Your "personal experience" is worthless scientifically. Design an experiment to detect the existence of spirits, carry it out, then publish the results so that other scientists can replicate your work. That's how one would scientifically prove the existence of spirits.
What are your thoughts on that?
What are my thoughts on indoctrination being the source of the public's belief in either theism or atheism (no capitals, it not a religious order)? My thoughts are that the instruments of indoctrination are possessed by only one side.
You also imply that science is inherently atheistic. The reality is that it merely follows the evidence. It cannot comment on that for which there is no evidence.
--Percy