Faith writes:
I think it ought to be considered on topic to try to answer the accusation that macroevolution is continuous with microevolution.
Well, small
is continuous with big, isn't it? We see small things grow into big things all the time. We see small changes become big changes all the time.
What is on topic is the question of WTF makes creationists think otherwise. We keep asking them to show us the line between small and big, what stops small from becoming big, but they have no answer.