Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2681 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 109 of 862 (690344)
02-12-2013 2:02 AM


In the thread Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1 I felt heckled by Dr Adequate. In posts 229, 232, 244, 246 he had very little significant to say from a scientific point of view, and many accusations. I thought this was against forum rules and am surprised there was no moderation there.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add a link to a message.

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-12-2013 2:07 AM mindspawn has not replied
 Message 111 by Adminnemooseus, posted 02-12-2013 3:33 AM mindspawn has not replied

  
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2681 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 173 of 862 (705999)
09-05-2013 6:27 AM


Post 353
Just after Percy's warning, this guy called me a fool or a liar (in the flood geology forum.) 24 hour suspensions generally seem a little weak to keep internet forums decent.
Edited by mindspawn, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Admin, posted 10-14-2013 8:47 AM mindspawn has replied

  
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2681 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 174 of 862 (708767)
10-14-2013 8:36 AM


Jar Message 808
EvC Forum: Which animals would populate the earth if the ark was real?
In message 808 Jar was unnecessarily rude:
"There is no fucking hole in the target dumbass."

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by Admin, posted 10-14-2013 8:59 AM mindspawn has not replied

  
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2681 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 178 of 862 (709149)
10-22-2013 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by Admin
10-14-2013 8:47 AM


Re: Post 353
Hi MindSpawn,
You're complaining about a message from a month and a half ago? Are you *trying* to be a nuisance?
Your behavior is raising doubts about your motives in everyone's mind, including my own. You can't use the Forum Guidelines as a shield to protect you from your own behavior.
Look Percy, I went through the correct channel at the correct time. Please read the date I complained before you jump to conclusions. The lack of timeous response to my SEPTEMBER complaint through the correct channels confirms to me that this site is weakly moderated.
I'm interested in science only. No hidden agendas, your site makes a civil discussion impossible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Admin, posted 10-14-2013 8:47 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by Admin, posted 10-22-2013 9:19 AM mindspawn has replied

  
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2681 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 180 of 862 (709244)
10-23-2013 6:49 AM
Reply to: Message 179 by Admin
10-22-2013 9:19 AM


Re: Post 353
Hi Mindspawn,
Sorry about not noticing the date, but the message is the same and my position hasn't changed. If you're not listening to my moderation and I'm not suspending you, then when others don't listen to my moderation how can I suspend them? Since so many are not listening to moderation my options are either to close the thread or just let things continue. I'm opting to keep the thread open.
Kindly suspend me if I break your rules. The lack of moderation is not in my favor.
If you insist on being determinedly nonsensical while ignoring my attempts to help you frame your contributions more rationally, then there's very little I can do when people take note of how nonsensical you're being. If you change your mind about accepting moderation then let me know
For some reason you pick on me. Have you considered that others could be framing their responses in a non-rational manner and you have kept quiet.
Also others have started off topic conversations and you have allowed them to start the conversations and then only warned me for continuing them, no warning given to them. All of this shows how disgusting this site is. It purports to be "discussion through understanding" and yet its a free-for-all with one-sided moderators.
I would welcome a suspension as a compliment, because this whole process is unscientific. Kindly see how bluegenes and I are able to have a civil discussion without distractions. With strict moderation you could force all parties to remain on subject and also remain scientific. With you openly taking sides, this encourages rudeness from your evolutionist peers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by Admin, posted 10-22-2013 9:19 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by Admin, posted 10-23-2013 8:24 AM mindspawn has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024