No, we should take a second look, ask ourselves who found this evidence, what their motives were, and what use the evidence actually is.
Attack the messenger rather than the message? When there are thousands of scientists coming to the same conclusions based on objective empirical evidence it must be their motives that are at fault?
Because it wasn't created in the same way it is sustained. ...
Do you have objective empirical evidence for this or is it just something you tell yourself to explain why science doesn't produce the answers you want?
... When we try to use the laws that it is sustained by to explain how it was created, we start making small errors that quickly snowball into really big errors.
Like the evidence that shows the earth is over 4.5 billion years? The evidence that the universe is over 12.5 billion years? The objective empirical evidence that is left by their creation?
A lot of things humans go to a lot of trouble to investigate are a complete waste of time. ...
Like the bible? LOL -- a lot of things humans do is a waste of time, but that doesn't mean scientific investigations necessarily are a waste of time.
... Life is short, there are a lot of important things to do that go undone because the scientific community is so busy chasing reinforcement to prop up its atheism.
There are more important things that don't get done because of politics and false beliefs -- beginning with teaching proper science in school.
Like the scientific community does with Intelligent Design. ...
Ah, refuting bad logic and unsupported assertions is ignoring them and pretending they'll go away.
... Like global warming alarmists do with economic knowledge of the catastrophe that will happen if their brand of 'licence, regulate, restrict, prohibit' is put into place?
Compared to the catastrophe that is occurring due to ignoring climate change?
No, it's strong enough that I don't have to test it, ...
Yep - that's one way to avoid testing it, a cognitive dissonance way.
... the same way you're afraid to test yours with something other than Darwinism.
Curiously I test my faith with ALL substantiated knowledge, not some twisted belief based misrepresentation.
Enjoy