Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,786 Year: 4,043/9,624 Month: 914/974 Week: 241/286 Day: 2/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why the Flood Never Happened
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 1248 of 1896 (716252)
01-14-2014 2:43 AM
Reply to: Message 1242 by Percy
01-13-2014 3:35 PM


Re: Evidence ain't unimportant
You mean "one million cubic miles," not "one cubic million miles", though I suppose it's the same thing.
Strictly speaking it's not. (although not necessarily an indication of Faith's intentions.)
For "One million cubic miles" imagine one million individual 1 mile cubes all lined up. measuring 1 million miles long, 1 mile high and 1 mile wide.
For "One cubic million miles" imaging a giant cube measuring 1 million miles x 1 million miles x 1 million miles
maybe easier to imagine on a smaller scale.
Compare "10 cubic centimetres" with "10 centimetres cubed"
-one gives you a row of 10 little cubes 10x1x1,
-the other gives you a cube 10x10x10
sorry to be a pedant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1242 by Percy, posted 01-13-2014 3:35 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1252 by Faith, posted 01-14-2014 8:30 AM Heathen has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


(2)
Message 1640 of 1896 (717395)
01-27-2014 2:31 AM
Reply to: Message 1639 by Faith
01-27-2014 2:24 AM


Re: the usual radiometric flimflam
I've pretty much proved the Flood on this thread already
You are completely deluded.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1639 by Faith, posted 01-27-2014 2:24 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1693 by Faith, posted 01-29-2014 4:39 PM Heathen has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 1643 of 1896 (717400)
01-27-2014 7:46 AM


Seems relevant
Grand Canyon 'formed recently' - BBC News
The world famous Grand Canyon, which snakes through the American state of Arizona, only took its present form relatively recently.
New research suggests that most of it was put in place just five to six million years ago.
Earlier studies had claimed the canyon was perhaps 70 million years old.

Replies to this message:
 Message 1651 by JonF, posted 01-27-2014 9:37 AM Heathen has replied
 Message 1657 by ramoss, posted 01-27-2014 12:25 PM Heathen has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 1652 of 1896 (717413)
01-27-2014 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 1651 by JonF
01-27-2014 9:37 AM


Re: Seems relevant
I never claimed it was earth shattering, just relevant...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1651 by JonF, posted 01-27-2014 9:37 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1658 by JonF, posted 01-27-2014 12:39 PM Heathen has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


(1)
Message 1678 of 1896 (717560)
01-29-2014 5:11 AM
Reply to: Message 1677 by Faith
01-29-2014 3:35 AM


Re: dinosaur again
there's no other possibility
I really don't know why you bother taking part in these discussions, and I no longer understand why anyone engages with you on these matters when you show such astounding, blinkered, willful ignorance.
You have been shown what the other possibilities are,
You have been shown how the evidence points to these possibilities.
You have been shown how the evidence does NOT support your irrational nonsense beliefs.
and yet you claim victory in the debate, and then come out with this gem.
unbelieveable
(ABE) As has been suggested before, it would be a far more honest position if you just said "Goddidit" and stopped trying to make false claims that the geological record supports your story.
Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.
Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1677 by Faith, posted 01-29-2014 3:35 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1679 by frako, posted 01-29-2014 5:15 AM Heathen has not replied
 Message 1687 by Faith, posted 01-29-2014 2:59 PM Heathen has replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


(1)
Message 1719 of 1896 (717652)
01-30-2014 2:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1687 by Faith
01-29-2014 2:59 PM


Re: dinosaur again
I've given lots of reasonable specifics in this discussion
You've said very little that could be considered "Reasonable"
The idea that any nonscientist -- OR scientist -- creationist should try to answer every conceivable objection to the Flood is irrational
if you could make a decent attempt at ONE it would be a start. But your idea of responding to a point is to say, "I don't know how, and I can't show it, but the flood has to be the only explanation" despite all the evidence telling you otherwise.
Obviously I do not impute anything about the Flood to miracle
Huh? so god, who decided he made an almighty balls-up when he created man, called forth a flood, with impossible amounts of water, violating the laws of physics, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics and many more. HE then made the flood dissappear(where?) and cleverly hid the genetic bottleneck that we should see, and apparently went out of his way to ensure that everything gave the impression of being millions of years old.
and you say there's no miracles or miraculous occurances here?
do you even have half a clue how utterly ridiculous your arguments are becoming?
Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1687 by Faith, posted 01-29-2014 2:59 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1721 by Faith, posted 01-30-2014 3:21 AM Heathen has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


(2)
Message 1766 of 1896 (717739)
01-31-2014 4:56 AM
Reply to: Message 1762 by Faith
01-31-2014 12:07 AM


Re: The nature of science, theory etc.
fallen human minds interpreting the rocks that deny God's word,
and you completely reject the possibility that it's fallen human minds interpreting God's word that deny the rocks?
Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1762 by Faith, posted 01-31-2014 12:07 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1769 by JonF, posted 01-31-2014 8:25 AM Heathen has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024