Summations Only

ITYM Glenn Morton, and he's thrown up his hands over the whole business and ain't talking.The picture comes from his We've Done Rivers, Let's Do Canyons. (FYI there's also River Channels Buried deep in the Geologic Column)

Any viable theory has to explain most or all of what the preceding theory explained. And it's very hard to get a theory accepted when it doesn't explain everything the preceding theory explained and more.To get us to accept your theory you have to replace all of geology, almost all of physics (including quantum mechanics), all of inorganic chemistry, and probably more that doesn't occur to me right now. Yeah, that's a ton of work, but what we have no took hundreds of thousands of people centuries to develop, and it works. No creationist ever, especially including you, has raised a valid objection to current theory. Not for lack of trying, of course, but rather from lack of evidence and rational argument.The fact That there's an incredibly large body of interrelated and consilient scientific knowledge is a terrible problem for you, but not for us.Oh, and your "irrational" charge is just another UABF.

At We've Done Rivers, Let's Do Canyons Glenn references Alistair R. Brown, Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data, AAPG Memoir 42, 1999, p. 115. It's behind a $41 paywall. Glenn gives some other examples; I found the paper for the second image but it's also paywalled.

No, it's a sinuous ridge. A negative version of an incised meander.{ABE} There were some cool images of sinuopus ridges posted at the old TWeb but I can't find them now.Want another cool underground canyon? I don't suppose you would have access to that paper? {/ABE}Edited by JonF, : Add stuff

She's explicitly stated that she is infallible on the subject.

Very telling.You've said they merely confirm what you were claiming. You don't even think of demonstrating they merely confirm what you were claiming. You don't even think of presenting arguments that they merely confirm what you were claiming.In spite of many messages pointing out those facts and begging you to support your claims.All you can do is proclaim.You really think we should just accept and believe whatever you say. You can't even conceive of the possibility of supporting your claims.Pathetic.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

And New Madrid is in the brown area. But Faith still needs to establish a basis for how much tectonic activity should be expected in the GC based on mainstream thinking.