|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Why the Flood Never Happened | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shalamabobbi Member (Idle past 2849 days) Posts: 397 Joined: |
What should be expected from someone who starts off the thread with evidence against the global flood and sees in it an argument for a global flood? Message 6
the fact of the different sediments and that they are so neatly separated and demarcated by sharp dividing lines between them.
See the first item on the list. Edited by shalamabobbi, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shalamabobbi Member (Idle past 2849 days) Posts: 397 Joined:
|
For those Christians who are concerned that the intellectual flood of insights provided in this thread might be lost due to error and/or malfeasance on the part of the moderators at EvC rest assured that the 39 pages of posts by Faith in this thread will soon be compiled into a book and added to the bible. It will be organized under a section that will bear the name "The Newest Testament" and besides her enlightened teachings that canyons can be carved underground will include other topics of interest such as Faith's theory of the degeneration of DNA over time since creation week. (God was apparently incapable of sufficiently robust biological engineering to cover for the possibility of the fall of mankind).
For those who are interested, a poll will soon be provided, so you can express your enthusiasm to have Faith added to the godhead creating a quadrinity from the older outdated trinity which fails to answer so many scientific puzzles and enigmas of our modern era. Remember the guru's example and follow her wise lead. When presented with an uncomfortable fact or piece of evidence simply stretch forth your arms making a cross with the index fingers and with voluminous discharge from the lungs pronounce it to be OFF TOPIC, in the holy name of Jesus, amen.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shalamabobbi Member (Idle past 2849 days) Posts: 397 Joined:
|
Faith focuses on different types of mountains just enough to relax the tension in her mind about different rates of erosion as though any significant erosion could take place in 4,000 years time. Perhaps we should focus on the Hawaiian islands and the fact that they were all created by the same general process over the same hot spot. Her theory requires the time between island creation to be rather narrow. Ignoring the radiometric dating as she does, which also disproves her theory, let's just consider the difference in erosion between the islands themselves. How could there be any significant difference there? They were created essentially at the same time in Faith's model. Big tectonic movement and coasting to a stop although the stop has not been realized, conveniently.
Unfortunately for Faith's model the rate of island formation alone doesn't seem to occur fast enough, let alone the time required for erosion. Loihi is the nail in the coffin but I'm sure Faith will put that "silly putty" of hers to work somehow.
quote:Page not found - Maui Vacations - Jon's Maui Info Edited by shalamabobbi, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shalamabobbi Member (Idle past 2849 days) Posts: 397 Joined: |
quote:http://www.deephawaii.com/hawaiianhistory.htm History of Hawaii Page not found - Hale Maluhia Country Inn So now Faith's model of a tectonic bump and the slowing down to the present rate is shortened by 1500 years. So that leaves roughly 2,500 years for Faith's plate movement. There are 8 islands so at best each island has just over 300 years to form. But there is the underwater chain to consider. Wouldn't the formation of that chain of seamounts take at least half the available time away for the Hawaiian Islands formation? That leaves about 150 years for each island to form. (50,000/150=333) So there is a factor of 333 disagreement between the observed rate of island formation as displayed by Loihi and the rate necessary for Faith's model to be credible. I see last night I lost my board virginity. I must take my leave now to make confession to a priest.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shalamabobbi Member (Idle past 2849 days) Posts: 397 Joined: |
Have you done or do you know of any calculations about the amount of energy required/released from superfast continental drift? The energy of motion for the Lithosphere at 20ft per day is not all that fantastic, not quite 6 little boys. mass of lithosphere = 1.365x10^23kg (I'm depending on this figure being accurate)http://www.madsci.org/...rchives/1999-11/943288749.Es.r.html The problem with her model is a cause for the initial separation. If they moved under the influence of currents why don't they continue to move at that rate? The arbitrary current that appears out of no where and then disappears again for no reason doesn't sit well with her claim of no divine intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shalamabobbi Member (Idle past 2849 days) Posts: 397 Joined:
|
1433
Faith writes: shalamabobbi writes: Surely you realize that the flood would deposit this load onto the ocean floor as well as onto whatever is left of the continents? Yes I assume it did. 1824
shalamabobbi writes: What should be expected from someone who starts off the thread with evidence against the global flood and sees in it an argument for a global flood? Message 6 Faith writes: the fact of the different sediments and that they are so neatly separated and demarcated by sharp dividing lines between them. See the first item on the list. 1827
Faith writes: Of course you have nothing to say about how you think it is against the Flood. How about this - since the ocean floor was buried under this load in your model that became the geologic column then the coral reefs were all buried.
quote: How did that 25% survive the flood without the coral reefs? But more importantly how did the reefs existing today grow in the time available since the flood??
quote:Age of Coral Reefs Of course you have nothing to say about how you think it is possible for the reefs to grow so quickly. YECs are off here by a factor of 35. But even if that were possible which it isn't then you still have this problem:
quote:same ref as before.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024