Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,478 Year: 3,735/9,624 Month: 606/974 Week: 219/276 Day: 59/34 Hour: 2/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Proposed New Topics ⇒

SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9

Normal Thread Display
Message 2 of 4 (718365)
02-06-2014 12:54 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
02-06-2014 12:09 PM

I don't think you can characterize historical science as an invention of creationists, see for example the paper cited by Roxrkool, Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science.
​
--Percy
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 02-06-2014 12:09 PM RAZD has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by RAZD, posted 02-06-2014 1:16 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9

Normal Thread Display
Message 4 of 4 (718374)
02-06-2014 1:25 PM

Thread Copied to Is It Science? Forum
Thread copied to the SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science. thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024