But how can my "interpretation" be an "interpretation" per say, when a plain surface reading of the text confirm it's meaning?
Job 38:22 calls both snow and hail "treasures", so it is clearly not about the wonderful crystal structure. Verse 23 explains that God can use both snow and hail as weapons in wartime. That's the "plain surface reading".
As I said, I like your interpretation but it's only useful as a secondary interpretation. It doesn't suggest that the author of Job had any scientific knowledge.
Why is every one resorting to perversions of scripture and every form heathen gnostic text to wash over the plain reading of the text in my OP.
I, for one, am not. I know nothing about gnostic texts and I haven't mentioned them.