Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9073 total)
63 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), PaulK, Tangle (5 members, 58 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,348 Year: 4,460/6,534 Month: 674/900 Week: 1/197 Day: 1/30 Hour: 1/0

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hast Thou ENTERED INTO the treasures of the snow?
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 43 of 66 (719378)
02-13-2014 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Modulous
02-13-2014 6:10 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
My dear modulous, yes that is precisely what I am saying, did I not clearly convey this position in my OP? Phew, are you a little slow on the uptake or is this your way of being petulant and pedantic within forum guidelines? I'm just seeking the truth.

Enoch, cannon? Etc, I don't follow. The 66 books is Scripture not a fable that depicts fallen angels teaching women kind to put on make up. Have a titter of wit man.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Modulous, posted 02-13-2014 6:10 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Modulous, posted 02-13-2014 8:39 PM Jaf has replied

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 44 of 66 (719379)
02-13-2014 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Dr Adequate
02-13-2014 10:07 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
1. it doesn't say EXACTLY the same thing, it doesn't say ENTER IN to hail, because as my learned friend said, one can observe the pattern in hail without a microscope not so with snow.

This is what you chaps are doing

Me "The quick brown fox jumped over the fence."

You Guys

"The book of Enoch would seem to suggest that said fox (actually a 14 billion year old axolotl) was not at all quick but clever because he in actual fact "darted" (the Greek for this word is darted but the word doesn't exist in Hebrew which makes the bible a lie) UNDER, do you see that UNDER not over the fence, which of course is what not only made him appear quick but also to appear like a fox jumping over a fence.

Editors note, it helps to take a large skull of peyote or mescaline before joining the forum.

Am I right?

Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-13-2014 10:07 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-13-2014 8:28 PM Jaf has replied
 Message 51 by arachnophilia, posted 02-13-2014 9:29 PM Jaf has replied

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 45 of 66 (719380)
02-13-2014 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by arachnophilia
02-13-2014 6:47 PM


Re: heathen perversions of scripture
Good one mate, that gave me good laugh. Put's into perspective what everyone's form is here. CHANGE WHATS BEEN SAID OR WRITTEN INTO SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT SAID OR WRITTEN! Even better change the language so no one can read it as if that makes some kind of valid and important point. IT DOESN'T! Although it was witty.

Your second point is off topic, but yes obviously I have considered it. I am left but with no excuse as to believe the Facts, the KJV is the best version in English we've got and all other English versions are in at least some way erroneous some of them are down write satanic its so obvious. Plus we have the Greek and Hebrew concordances of every word, we lack nothing, you don't even need to be a fool and waste years learning Hebrew and Greek thinking this is the only way you are going to know the truth.

I don't mean it foolish to learn either of these wonderful languages by the way. But Ive seen atheist say such things as Ive mentioned above as if to imply that because they have learned these languages they are far better qualified to discus scripture with some faith head Christian who hasn't, which is arrogance in the extreme not to mention utter rubbish!.

Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.

Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by arachnophilia, posted 02-13-2014 6:47 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by arachnophilia, posted 02-13-2014 9:23 PM Jaf has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 46 of 66 (719384)
02-13-2014 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Dr Adequate
02-13-2014 10:07 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Psalm 135:& whilst wonderful scripture it is no comparison to

"Hast thou ENTERED INTO the treasures of the snow? You are ignoring ENTERED INTO, may I bring that to your attention please and thank you? Can you address these particular two words please, these two words that require no interpretation or enoch's willing assistance, go away enoch, didnt you freaken vanish? Or other versions or scriptures from other books, or other languages. Please in the name of peace love and tranquility to all creatures including inanimate objects, to all stay on topic?

Kind regards

JAF PTL


This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-13-2014 10:07 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-13-2014 8:31 PM Jaf has replied

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 52 of 66 (719409)
02-13-2014 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Dr Adequate
02-13-2014 8:31 PM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Observed goes without saying as it clearly does mean that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-13-2014 8:31 PM Dr Adequate has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 53 of 66 (719411)
02-13-2014 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by arachnophilia
02-13-2014 9:29 PM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Still, it's unacceptable and off topic nevertheless.

It says what it says and it means what it means.

Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by arachnophilia, posted 02-13-2014 9:29 PM arachnophilia has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 54 of 66 (719412)
02-13-2014 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Dr Adequate
02-13-2014 8:28 PM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
My dear whats your name again? Yes that is precisely what I am saying, did I not clearly convey this position in my OP? Phew, are you a little slow on the uptake or is this your way of being petulant and pedantic within forum guidelines? I'm just seeking the truth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-13-2014 8:28 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by roxrkool, posted 02-13-2014 11:40 PM Jaf has replied
 Message 60 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2014 12:08 AM Jaf has replied

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 55 of 66 (719414)
02-13-2014 11:36 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Modulous
02-13-2014 8:39 PM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Mr Speaker this man is inciting and flaming....

To enter into the treasuries of the show clearly means "observing the unseen microscopic wonders of the snow unseen until microscopes because clearly for Job to do so with out being the all seeing God, he would have to be microscopically small and or possess a microscope and God clearly knew Job did not possess a microscope. I suppose you could say God bragging about the wonders of the snow to Job wouldn't mean diddley to Job, but to us it has immense importance 5000 years later.

Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.

Edited by Jaf, : spelling


This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Modulous, posted 02-13-2014 8:39 PM Modulous has seen this message

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 57 of 66 (719416)
02-13-2014 11:41 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Modulous
02-13-2014 8:39 PM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
The microscopic beauty is the treasure. If snow wasn't so microscopically beautiful you guys would have an argument but laugh out loud, it is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Modulous, posted 02-13-2014 8:39 PM Modulous has seen this message

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2014 12:01 AM Jaf has replied

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 58 of 66 (719418)
02-13-2014 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by roxrkool
02-13-2014 11:40 PM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Sincerely my friend I need no validation save the very words God breathed, they will never pass away, you can huff and you can puff etc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by roxrkool, posted 02-13-2014 11:40 PM roxrkool has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 61 of 66 (719429)
02-14-2014 12:15 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Dr Adequate
02-14-2014 12:01 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Again, the words didn't say ENTER INTO HAIL....only snow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2014 12:01 AM Dr Adequate has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by ringo, posted 02-14-2014 10:42 AM Jaf has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 62 of 66 (719433)
02-14-2014 12:18 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Dr Adequate
02-14-2014 12:01 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
ehem, the whole point is that it says it here in the bible AKA the point of the OP, "no where else in the bible" is no more a valid argument than "Enoch said this...."

okay? Just roll over and let me scratch your belly. You got nuthin but a bleating whine.

Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2014 12:01 AM Dr Adequate has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 63 of 66 (719435)
02-14-2014 12:20 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Dr Adequate
02-14-2014 12:08 AM


DEAR MODERATORS THIS MEMBER ADMIST TO INTENIONALL MOCKING ME
Is this not a rule violation in other words, mods can you get this troll off my back? It is vexatious in spirit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2014 12:08 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Jaf, posted 02-14-2014 12:23 AM Jaf has taken no action
 Message 66 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2014 5:21 PM Jaf has taken no action

  
Jaf
Member (Idle past 2935 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 64 of 66 (719436)
02-14-2014 12:23 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by Jaf
02-14-2014 12:20 AM


Re: DEAR MODERATORS THIS MEMBER ADMITS TO INTENIONAL MOCKING OF ANOTHER MEMBER.
This is really just not cricket. I move that this vexatious troll be removed from the chamber immediately for a time of contemplating it's journey to the abyss.

Thank you and kind regards dear mods.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Jaf, posted 02-14-2014 12:20 AM Jaf has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022