Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
119 online now:
kjsimons, nwr, PaulK, Percy (Admin) (4 members, 115 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,071 Year: 5,183/6,534 Month: 26/577 Week: 14/80 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Links for the Creation/Evolution Controversy (not a debate topic)
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 265 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


(1)
Message 69 of 147 (719399)
02-13-2014 10:14 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by PaulK
02-13-2014 2:06 AM


Re: "All Science is Historical Science"
Apparently, a concept far too advanced for Creationists to understand.

Ham didn't bother to explain why this assumption would be problematic, but that's really irrelevant given that we don't assume that the laws extend into the indefinite past. We have evidence that they do.

Edited by roxrkool, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by PaulK, posted 02-13-2014 2:06 AM PaulK has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022