My dear modulous, yes that is precisely what I am saying, did I not clearly convey this position in my OP? Phew, are you a little slow on the uptake or is this your way of being petulant and pedantic within forum guidelines? I'm just seeking the truth.
Enoch, cannon? Etc, I don't follow. The 66 books is Scripture not a fable that depicts fallen angels teaching women kind to put on make up. Have a titter of wit man.
1. it doesn't say EXACTLY the same thing, it doesn't say ENTER IN to hail, because as my learned friend said, one can observe the pattern in hail without a microscope not so with snow.
This is what you chaps are doing
Me "The quick brown fox jumped over the fence."
"The book of Enoch would seem to suggest that said fox (actually a 14 billion year old axolotl) was not at all quick but clever because he in actual fact "darted" (the Greek for this word is darted but the word doesn't exist in Hebrew which makes the bible a lie) UNDER, do you see that UNDER not over the fence, which of course is what not only made him appear quick but also to appear like a fox jumping over a fence.
Editors note, it helps to take a large skull of peyote or mescaline before joining the forum.
Good one mate, that gave me good laugh. Put's into perspective what everyone's form is here. CHANGE WHATS BEEN SAID OR WRITTEN INTO SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT SAID OR WRITTEN! Even better change the language so no one can read it as if that makes some kind of valid and important point. IT DOESN'T! Although it was witty.
Your second point is off topic, but yes obviously I have considered it. I am left but with no excuse as to believe the Facts, the KJV is the best version in English we've got and all other English versions are in at least some way erroneous some of them are down write satanic its so obvious. Plus we have the Greek and Hebrew concordances of every word, we lack nothing, you don't even need to be a fool and waste years learning Hebrew and Greek thinking this is the only way you are going to know the truth.
I don't mean it foolish to learn either of these wonderful languages by the way. But Ive seen atheist say such things as Ive mentioned above as if to imply that because they have learned these languages they are far better qualified to discus scripture with some faith head Christian who hasn't, which is arrogance in the extreme not to mention utter rubbish!.
Psalm 135:& whilst wonderful scripture it is no comparison to
"Hast thou ENTERED INTO the treasures of the snow? You are ignoring ENTERED INTO, may I bring that to your attention please and thank you? Can you address these particular two words please, these two words that require no interpretation or enoch's willing assistance, go away enoch, didnt you freaken vanish? Or other versions or scriptures from other books, or other languages. Please in the name of peace love and tranquility to all creatures including inanimate objects, to all stay on topic?
My dear whats your name again? Yes that is precisely what I am saying, did I not clearly convey this position in my OP? Phew, are you a little slow on the uptake or is this your way of being petulant and pedantic within forum guidelines? I'm just seeking the truth.
To enter into the treasuries of the show clearly means "observing the unseen microscopic wonders of the snow unseen until microscopes because clearly for Job to do so with out being the all seeing God, he would have to be microscopically small and or possess a microscope and God clearly knew Job did not possess a microscope. I suppose you could say God bragging about the wonders of the snow to Job wouldn't mean diddley to Job, but to us it has immense importance 5000 years later.