Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 68 (9078 total)
607 online now:
AZPaul3, Dredge, PaulK (3 members, 604 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 894,950 Year: 6,062/6,534 Month: 255/650 Week: 25/278 Day: 25/27 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hast Thou ENTERED INTO the treasures of the snow?
ringo
Member
Posts: 19720
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 34 of 66 (718909)
02-09-2014 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jaf
02-08-2014 12:36 AM


Jaf writes:

Question: How can you ignore this scripture as to God's REVEALING His knowledge of the wonders of snow 5000 years before the microscope?


By understanding it.

I like your poetic interpretation of the verse. It just doesn't seem to be what the verse is actually saying.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jaf, posted 02-08-2014 12:36 AM Jaf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Jaf, posted 02-13-2014 5:05 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 19720
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 39 of 66 (719332)
02-13-2014 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Jaf
02-13-2014 5:05 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Jaf writes:

But how can my "interpretation" be an "interpretation" per say, when a plain surface reading of the text confirm it's meaning?


Job 38:22 calls both snow and hail "treasures", so it is clearly not about the wonderful crystal structure. Verse 23 explains that God can use both snow and hail as weapons in wartime. That's the "plain surface reading".

As I said, I like your interpretation but it's only useful as a secondary interpretation. It doesn't suggest that the author of Job had any scientific knowledge.

Jaf writes:

Why is every one resorting to perversions of scripture and every form heathen gnostic text to wash over the plain reading of the text in my OP.


I, for one, am not. I know nothing about gnostic texts and I haven't mentioned them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Jaf, posted 02-13-2014 5:05 AM Jaf has not replied

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 19720
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 65 of 66 (719474)
02-14-2014 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Jaf
02-14-2014 12:15 AM


Re: No "interpretation" is required or necessary.
Jaf writes:

Again, the words didn't say ENTER INTO HAIL....only snow.


quote:
Job 38:22 Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail....

So "entered into" means "observed" but "seen" doesn't?

Edited by ringo, : Fixed quote.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Jaf, posted 02-14-2014 12:15 AM Jaf has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022