The author of the creationist paper has rigged the methodology to ignore gaps, and therefore return a false result.
The projection in the rest of the paper is also worth discussing, but this is the one major issue that the paper has and so it should be discussed first.
I wonder how the creationistis reconcile their
utter and total lack of integrity with their preconception of moral superiority compared to "secular scientists"?
The scientific community should raise their voice a notch or three and really hammer this deceitful nature of creationism so that every layman can understand it.
Loathable folks them cretins...
™ Version 4.2
(1)
