This board is just a load of shit...

This is,

​

by far,

​

the worst,

​

most absurd,

​

illogical,

​

irrational,

​

unsound,

​

disgusting,

​

sick,

​

twisted

​

and stupid

​

board

​

I have ever

​

laid my eyes on.

​

Get a life, dorks...

​

Why don't

​

all of you

​

crap-eaters

​

just go

​

fuck yourselves? [This message has been edited by I'llFeedYouMyCrap, 12-10-2003]

What a poet...combining the elegant prose of Jet with the keen wit of Wise.

Mr./Ms. Crap has been suspended (Admin may wish to delete) and banned by IP number. I suspect this message will be deleted somewhere down the line.Adminnemooseus

Sticks and stones may break our bones
But argument and evidence never were presented?

Let me guess, you're a christian?

Oh the joy...

I've done a complete technical analysis () of Mr. I'llFeed's post and have found the following:

1. The message was posted from an IP address that has never posted here before.
   ​
2. Mr. I'llFeed went to the trouble of learning which non-standard UBB codes work at this board. He used the "color" and "size" UBB codes.

The irony is that his description of the board wasn't accurate until he posted.Why the assumption that Mr. I'llFeed is a Creationist? Aren't the Creationists here offended at this jumping to conclusions?--Percy

A rather professional piece of work by a person who is obviously concerned with approaching debate calmly and with a clear head. Does this mean they will no longer be our friend? Pity. I am sure from their post that they so much to teach us and we could have been so much better off basking in the glow of their wisdom.

It wasn't so much the prose and sheer wit that impressed me. On those criteria I only give it a 3.5. It was the extreme overuse of commas that was so unique. Using, that, many, commas, so, completely, inappropriately, in, a, single, sentence, subtantially increases the flame rating. By THAT criteria, I'd have to give it a 5.0. However, the fact that the poster didn't mispell any words - and there were some big words in there normally not used by people who post like that amid the profanity - lowers the overall rating by half a point. Overall, therefore, the post receives a flame score of 4.5.

Q,I think you underestimate the force of the challenge I'llFeed presents to us evolutionists. What he's asking is who are we to think we can determine a realistic, responsible scientific methodology for the 21st century if we're too stupid to eat crap and fuck ourselves at the same time?------------------
The dark nursery of evolution is very dark indeed.
Brad McFall

Well, that depends on the definition of "fuck ourselves". If "ourselves" refers to all of us as a group, then the challenge is easy. We pair off with individual partners, a plate of shit per pair, and two forks.However, if the command to fuck ourselves is aimed at each of us individually, (i.e. Hambre go fuck yourself, Dan go fuck yourself, Quetzal go fuck yourself, etc) then things become more difficult. Does "fuck" refer to any sexual act, or specifically to self penetration? If it's the latter, before even approaching the level of contortion required, fucking ourselves (with exceptions for Rei and Asgara) would cut us off from the source of crap, making the task impossible. Although his argument has a fatal flaw; at no point did he say that we had to eat our own crap. The challenge can be fulfilled.To sum up, like all creationist challenges, the one presented by I'llFeedYouMyCrap is far too vague in its definitions to be taken seriously. Even if we fulfilled his request to the letter, I'm sure he'd show up again to say we were eating the wrong kind of crap.------------------
Mrs. Krabappel: Are there any questions?
Bart: Yes, how would I go about creating a half-man/half-monkey type of creature?
Mrs. Krabappel: I'm sorry, that would be playing God.
Bart: God schmod! I want my monkey-man!

LOLI'm guessing Creationist, too. Call it experience.Out of curiosity, where are they from?

ahaha I'd nominate this post for post of the month, but I'm not sure that would be appropriate. Good one!!

quote:

---

I'd nominate this post for post of the month, but I'm not sure that would be appropriate.

---

That's the line I like to walk.

Hmm, I'm not sure you're seeing the full implications of this challenge. As Dan points out, "selfing" is a physical impossibility to the vast majority of our species who are not double-jointed contortionists. OTOH, if looked at from a creationist perspective, a case could be made that we're dealing with further evidence of the Fall of Man from his previous pre-curse state of perfection. All you need to do is watch any self-respecting dog lick him/herself. In other words, "lower" animals are quite capable of meeting the challenge posed in the OP. Since Man was originally specially created to be the epitome of life, it follows that Adam WAS capable of this feat, and that we poor cursed humans have lost this ability. I wonder if this would be micro or macroevolution?(Q makes note to self: Do NOT allow my 12-year-old daughter to read this particular thread.)