Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,418 Year: 3,675/9,624 Month: 546/974 Week: 159/276 Day: 33/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Two types of science
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 8 of 184 (715807)
01-09-2014 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by marc9000
01-05-2014 4:04 PM


marc9000 writes:
The purpose of this thread is to show that some science, such as deep space speculation, age of the earth speculation, etc. have a much smaller "body of techniques" available to study them, than do current day applications of science, such as medical study, or any present day workings with present day materials.
You're making a distinction between "science" and "applications of science". If the applications work, that's an indication that the science is sound. If we can send a probe into (relatively) deep space and have it go where we expect it to go, that suggests that the deep space "speculation" is accurate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by marc9000, posted 01-05-2014 4:04 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 183 of 184 (724680)
04-19-2014 12:46 PM
Reply to: Message 173 by Coyote
04-18-2014 4:04 PM


Re: Same stuff, different day
Coyote writes:
There are a lot of conservatives who support science, so don't lump us all in with the fundamentalists.
quote:
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives. -- John Stuart Mill

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Coyote, posted 04-18-2014 4:04 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024