Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,832 Year: 4,089/9,624 Month: 960/974 Week: 287/286 Day: 8/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big-Sediment vs. Little-Sediment Flood Geology?
gene90
Member (Idle past 3850 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 9 of 18 (72959)
12-15-2003 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by roxrkool
12-13-2003 10:47 AM


I disagree
quote:
A global flood would leave a thick graded layer
Basically a giant Bouma sequence resting on an erosional unconformity.
quote:
You'd be able to trace it to every continent in the world.
Must of the Flood layer would be found deposited in the current ocean basins, where, of course, ODP logs have failed to find it.
I feel that the associated deltas have been mischaracterized. I propose the the deltas would be composed mostly of cobbles and boulders, whereas sediments would bypass the deltas and be deposited offshore. While it is entirely possible that a great flood would leave deposits on continents, I feel that a catastrophic regression might leave an erosional unconformity with local, Flood deposits reworked (a la Channeled Scablands). This sounds a lot like Moose's model, which I mostly concur with. 'Dunes' of conglomerate eroded by post-Flood streams. submarine fans, while fines would tend to be offshore.
[This message has been edited by gene90, 12-15-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by roxrkool, posted 12-13-2003 10:47 AM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by roxrkool, posted 12-15-2003 1:44 PM gene90 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024