Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fountains of the deep, new evidence
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 25 of 106 (736212)
09-05-2014 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Colbard
09-05-2014 5:47 AM


Re: Water in the earth
The purpose of the Authorized King James Bible was not to deal with science but rather to be politically correct. When it comes to science though it is most certainly incorrect on almost every thing. For example both of the mutually exclusive flood myths have been refuted and so it is easy to show with a degree of certainty near absolute that neither of the Biblical flood happened.
Further, even in the Biblical Flood myths there is no mention of volcanoes, mountain raising, earth turning over or any other such nonsense.
Have you ever actually read the Bible in any version?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Colbard, posted 09-05-2014 5:47 AM Colbard has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 37 of 106 (736264)
09-06-2014 8:28 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Colbard
09-06-2014 5:15 AM


more utter bullshit and nonsense
I checked on the direction of the blast zone, and it was NE direction, which does not surprise me, because the direction of the flood waters was to the greater part from west to east, especially towards the end of the flood, when this crater may have formed.
Utter bullshit and nonsense. Why would flood waters be from west to east and what would that have to do with any blast zone.
Is your goal only to make Christians look stupid?
Have you ever read the Bible in any version?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 5:15 AM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 9:10 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 42 of 106 (736281)
09-06-2014 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by Colbard
09-06-2014 9:10 AM


Re: more utter bullshit and nonsense
I do think it is important to point out utter nonsense and bullshit.
You are of course free to say what ever you wish about my views but please understand that I may well once again present facts to support my position.
There is nothing in either of the Biblical Flood myths that would support your assertion of "I checked on the direction of the blast zone, and it was NE direction, which does not surprise me, because the direction of the flood waters was to the greater part from west to east, especially towards the end of the flood, when this crater may have formed."
If you have evidence please present it. And also be aware that I have actually read the Bible so don't try your normal evasion of saying "read Genesis".

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 9:10 AM Colbard has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 71 of 106 (743271)
11-29-2014 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Colbard
11-29-2014 8:16 AM


Re: Water in the earth
colbard writes:
Ringo writes:
But you don't accept the dating today. Why not?
Because I have had far too much evidence on the contrary.
Yet you have never presented any of your alleged evidence.
What evidence do you have?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Colbard, posted 11-29-2014 8:16 AM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Colbard, posted 11-30-2014 6:01 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 77 of 106 (743357)
11-30-2014 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Colbard
11-30-2014 6:01 AM


Re: Water in the earth
One of the features here is that replies are links so you can see exactly what is being referenced. In this case it is your claim to have evidence that refutes current dating methods.
quote:
jar writes:
colbard writes:
Ringo writes:
But you don't accept the dating today. Why not?
Because I have had far too much evidence on the contrary.
Yet you have never presented any of your alleged evidence.
What evidence do you have?

But you have never provided any evidence for any of your assertions like having an Australian penny radio-carbon dated or your teacher was an atheist who shortly after the alleged penny dating incident became a Christian or that the earth is about 6000 years old.
So what evidence do you have that shows the current dating methods are incorrect?
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Colbard, posted 11-30-2014 6:01 AM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Colbard, posted 12-05-2014 7:16 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 84 of 106 (743835)
12-05-2014 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by Colbard
12-05-2014 7:16 AM


try actually ansering questions.
Colbard writes:
Jar writes:
So what evidence do you have that shows the current dating methods are incorrect?
Too much. Besides, you seem to have accepted that they are correct, is that an act of faith?
Once again you are simply trying to Palm the Pea.
What evidence do you have that shows the current dating methods are incorrect?
And no, my acceptance of the current dating methods requires no faith at all.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Colbard, posted 12-05-2014 7:16 AM Colbard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024