Backwards debate: the flood

Backwards debate is my idea that instead of arguing your own belief, you argue the opposite. Creationists will support evolution, and evolutionists will support creation. I hope that this will allow us to understand each other better! I got this idea after seeing that one person commented "creationism is stupid"Rules:
1 argue for the other side. No exeptions!
2 no saying "i cant find any evidence for the other side"
3 Actually research and look for valid evidence for the other side!
Did the flood of the bible happen? What evidence is there for or against the world being flooded with water? Are you ready?
Let the games.... Begin!Edited by Bookworm7890, : No reason given.Edited by Bookworm7890, : Made topic more specific

Hi Bookworm,This website has many forums, each devoted to a major topic area of the creation/evolution debate (there's also a miscellaneous forum). Threads have a specific topic within one of the major topic areas. Your idea of a 'trading places" debate is fine, but you need an actual topic.Edited by Admin, : Typo.

I added a topic

Hi Bookworm,I understood from the title that you'd like to discuss the flood, but what specifically about the flood? If you glance through the Geology and the Great Flood forum you can see how many aspects of the flood there are to discuss. Recent threads discussed how the geologic column forms, Walther's Law, the ark, the Grand Canyon, where the flood waters came from and where they went, how limestone layers form, sea floor formation, plate tectonics, fossil distribution, ice ages, etc. etc. etc.If I could make a suggestion for a flood topic, how about presenting and discussing the physical evidence that the Biblical flood ever happened, meaning a global flood around 4500 years ago.

Thanks for the suggestion! I have edited the post as you requested. Appreciate the help!

Thread copied to the Backwards debate: the flood thread in the Geology and the Great Flood forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.