|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 2742 days) Posts: 2965 From: Los Angeles, CA USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Was Adam Packin' Heat? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
djufo writes:
He created both Adam and Eve in His image:
Yes, God did create Adam in his image after his own likeness.quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
djufo writes:
It doesn't say there he created Adam and Eve in his image. It says he created both, but only him "Adam" in his image.quote:In English, "created he him" and "created he them" both refer back to "man". That is, "male and female" refers to "man" so "man" must be mankind - and both were created in God's image. If the Hebrew says something different, it's a mistranslation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
djufo writes:
Which part is incorrect? The "mono" or the "theism" or both?
Monotheism is incorrect. djufo writes:
If our creator "came to exist" he is not the original god; he's just an alien life-form. Who created his parents? Of course sex requires 2 Gods. How do you think our creator came to exist? If God has genitals, you're stuck in infinite regression.
djufo writes:
Old things tend to fall apart. I think that explains your "knowledge".
The ancient knowledge told me so.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
djufo writes:
So tell us what to read. Give us the references. Otherwise, it looks like you're just making it up.
You guys have to read a lot and a lot and a lot of more things to understand....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
djufo writes:
The problem with self-education is that there's often no discipline. You find an intereting idea and you look for more information about that idea. On the other hand, if you get a proper formal education with "qualifications", they force you to read things you don't want to read, like the criticism of your favorite ideas. That's why people with "qualifiations" are less likely to fall for nonsense like pyramidology than people who have "educated themselves" by memorizing the Internet. All I know I started it by myself studying theoretical physics, philosophy, ancient civilizations, mythology, religions, applied physics, universal history, etc. Any mortal has the ability to research and uncover our origins. And one of the criticism of an "expert" is the "qualifications" to discuss and argue. I suspect that you're reluctant to give us a reading list because your bias would beome painfully obvious.
djufo writes:
Well, reason and logic are certainly part of many degrees. Reason, logic and common sense is not available as a degree anywhere in the world. As for common sense, dirt is common but it isn't necessarily valuable.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
But chimps, tree shrews, dogs, etc. all have genitals, so by your logic they're all created in God's image too. We are made in His Image not a chimps image or a ape image or a Eucharonta image or a tree shrew image or a inbreed dog image, but the iMAGE of the living God. On the other hand, if humans were created in some kind of woo-woo "spiritual image", we might be considered unique.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
Where's the logic in that? It''s just an empty assertion. If genitalia are part of God's image and many animals have genitalia, then why are only humans created in God's image?
We, humans are made in the image of God, not the animals he created.... we as in us, humans.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
If the Holy Spirit has her own womb, why did she need Mary's to make Jesus?
she does have a sacred internal member both beautiful and functional, as thereIN it is called the Womb of God...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Davidjay writes:
God made Adam and Eve without using a womb. He was taking a shortcut already by getting Mary pregnant. So it doesn't make any sense whatsoever for the Holy Spirit to have a womb.
Because Mary was a human and Jesus had to be physically....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
Well, I didn't expect an answer. The question was meant to underscore your asinine point.
Ringo, thanks for illustrating an insincere question, that you supposedly want an answer to.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
According to Exodus 33, what Moses saw was God's "glory". Think of a very bright light. You can't look at it directly without damaging your eyesight but if it's pointed away from you - i.e. you're behind it - you can see it reflected from other objects.
The Lord had a 'maximus' behind and in front... as Moses saw it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
I speak from reading the Bible. You should try it sometime instead of making up your own stories.
I quess you speak from experience.... Davidjay writes:
Why do you accept that story as written but you make up a lot of silly nonsense about the story in Exodus?
Anyway, for the sake of READERS and not you Ringo, again note how Jesus was before their eyes and was real, even after his resurrection, witnessed and realised by doubting Thomas.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
Some of it is and some of it isn't. Do you think Psalm 23 was written by a literal sheep or a figurative sheep?
Anyway the Bible is literal.... Davidjay writes:
That's what I'm saying. What the text actually SAYS is nothing about God's naughty bits. You're the one who is adding a fanciful interpretation.
As for exodus, the first one was literal....
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024