In a court of law, the prosecution has to "prove" its case to the jury, not the spectators. Similarly, science aims to make its case to people who have actually looked at the evidence. No offense, but nobody's interested in "proving" anything to you.
As nobody is interested in the "belief" of the scientific "religion" therefore common sense tells any mortal with average IQ that a creation of homo sapiens makes much more sense than a fairy tail of a missing link.
I see a lot of emotions going on. Usually emotions are used and manipulated by "science" to successfully convince the masses into "belief" The only muppets here are those trying to put together a monkey skeleton with shoulders and arms out of place to make it look somewhat similar to a human skeleton next to it. Theres a lot of people who pays for shark meat instead of real tuna and they don't know it. Prove that we evolved from primates. The missing link is just hilarious. Tell me where he lives and where does he works because I can't imagine the descendants of a missing link wearing a suit.
Exactly and evidence is what science does not have to support that ridiculous theory. From our most recent supposedly ancestor, we look absolutely different. The bone structure of the head and body is completely different. The extremity bones are made to support the strength of any primate. We radically, magically, lack that strength. If we put those muscles and tendons in our bones, they will shatter like glass. We don't even have the same chromosomes. We have 46, they have 48. Where is the transition. Where is the evolution. Even if it happened there is no time. A change so big, so radical, as we have between the two cretures would take millions of years. Our last common ancestor, DOES show an evolutionary line with its previous ancestors. But between that one and us, is not an evolution. Its a giant leap.
Why you tilt his head forward? let it rest on its original position and overlap a modern homo sapiens. Then try to explain how in the world you come from that monkey to a modern human in one generation.
I know you're just trying to justify your work with those long posts but in reality you are not proving absolutely anything. You are just running in circles with the same fictional ideas that have been running around for decades. You are worried (emotion) about the sustainability of the theory which is more senseless by the day.