Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fusion Power on the way - at last ?
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.4


(1)
Message 43 of 130 (740795)
11-07-2014 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by NoNukes
11-06-2014 6:54 PM


Re: All Good Things Suck At First
NoNukes writes:
The waste products from coal are not radioactive, but non-radioactive is not the same as non-toxic.
Actually coal plants do produce radioactive waste. But, yes, the other waste is HORRIBLE. Coal: simply the worst way to make energy.
See this article in Scientific American:
Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste - Scientific American
Edited by xongsmith, : simply

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by NoNukes, posted 11-06-2014 6:54 PM NoNukes has not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 44 of 130 (740806)
11-07-2014 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Jon
11-07-2014 10:01 AM


Re: All Good Things Suck ” At First
Jon writes:
What do we do with coal ash, Jon?
We are increasingly finding ways to recycle more of it into useful products.
What are we recycling nuclear waste into?
See Message 43,
See this article in Scientific American:
Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste - Scientific American
Also see Coal and Water Pollution | Union of Concerned Scientists
Coal is the simply the worst possible way to make energy.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Jon, posted 11-07-2014 10:01 AM Jon has not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.4


(1)
Message 45 of 130 (740808)
11-07-2014 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Jon
11-07-2014 1:21 PM


Re: All Good Things Suck ” At First
Jon writes:
Fusion, if it gets going, will be better. And that is why it stands an actual chance of replacing fossil fuels.
By the time fusion is ready to replace other energy sources, fossil fuel will no longer be in use. Fusion might be able to replace solar, wind and hydro-electric.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Jon, posted 11-07-2014 1:21 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Jon, posted 11-07-2014 7:20 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.4


(1)
Message 88 of 130 (741219)
11-10-2014 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by ringo
11-10-2014 12:08 PM


Re: All Good Things Suck ” At First
Ringo asks of Jon:
So, what's the input?
Maybe it'll just suck the Deuterium & Tritium out of thin air....
...store the waste Helium to sell to the circuses for their balloons?

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by ringo, posted 11-10-2014 12:08 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 104 of 130 (741665)
11-13-2014 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Rahvin
11-13-2014 3:17 PM


Re: All Good Things Suck ” At First
Rahvin writes:
Reprocessing spent fuel is superior in every way.
But isn't there right now already a lot of dirty waste that cannot be reprocessed? That's where the subduction zones come in as a solution. I may be wrong about this....
The existing nuclear plants should all be upgraded to Thorium or at least modern technology.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Rahvin, posted 11-13-2014 3:17 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Rahvin, posted 11-13-2014 5:05 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024