Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 73 (8962 total)
184 online now:
Aussie, jar, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle (5 members, 179 visitors)
Newest Member: Samuel567
Post Volume: Total: 871,138 Year: 2,886/23,288 Month: 1,077/1,809 Week: 196/313 Day: 8/69 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hollow Earth Expedition?
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 151 of 177 (741266)
11-10-2014 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by jar
11-10-2014 6:55 PM


Re ancients
Just say "I don't know anything about it"

What you don't know, does not make what others know crap. You are being unscientific.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by jar, posted 11-10-2014 6:55 PM jar has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by edge, posted 11-13-2014 4:05 PM Colbard has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 155 of 177 (741405)
11-12-2014 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Coyote
11-10-2014 10:03 PM


Re: Consuming interior
Coyote writes:

Is there some particular reason you are choosing to believe old tribal myths rather than the findings of modern scientific?

Yes, about one thousand findings in nature.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Coyote, posted 11-10-2014 10:03 PM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 156 of 177 (741408)
11-12-2014 8:32 AM
Reply to: Message 154 by edge
11-11-2014 9:54 PM


Re: Consuming interior
Edge writes:

Please, tell my you are just making this up on your own. You don't have any mentors or any help, right? And there's actually nothing published. Is that correct? And please assure us that you are self-medicating.
If more than one person was even remotely involved with this, I'd be shocked.

And that makes it wrong?

How many people would you need, that know what I have just posted, before it becomes true to you?

Interesting isn't it, what you might base your truth on?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by edge, posted 11-11-2014 9:54 PM edge has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by edge, posted 11-12-2014 10:39 AM Colbard has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 160 of 177 (741548)
11-13-2014 6:41 AM


Fortunately we have the moralizing thought police here to keep us all sane in the way of tradition and popular opinion.
People that cannot think for themselves and only reflect the base thoughts of others, are immune to new thought and discoveries, and find it threatening, so they call for arms and bans and lynch mobs to correct heretics and burn them.
A new age of science or the dark ages in another form?

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by NoNukes, posted 11-13-2014 3:09 PM Colbard has responded
 Message 165 by New Cat's Eye, posted 11-13-2014 4:17 PM Colbard has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 161 of 177 (741549)
11-13-2014 7:00 AM


I throw things out there, because I am certain that among the high number who do not get it, there will be one or two, who have done their homework, and are hungry for more. And who know exactly what I am saying.

Edited by Colbard, : subtract


Replies to this message:
 Message 162 by JonF, posted 11-13-2014 8:03 AM Colbard has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 166 of 177 (741708)
11-14-2014 1:25 AM


Just because you don't understand something does not necessarily mean it is crap, and it certainly does not give you the immediate right to call that someone names.

Slapping someone down is not really scientific, its more desperate.

Besides if you were to play by your own rules, then you would have to have your opinion proven, peer reviewed and approved before you can claim its desired impact.

So going by that, what you have said about my posts has no merit.


Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by Theodoric, posted 11-14-2014 8:53 AM Colbard has responded
 Message 168 by New Cat's Eye, posted 11-14-2014 9:28 AM Colbard has responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 169 of 177 (741816)
11-14-2014 8:38 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by Theodoric
11-14-2014 8:53 AM


Hollow attraction
Theodoric writes:

Instead of whining how about some evidence. If all you have is whine, this is not the forum for you.

Hollow earth is not scientific 'fact' so what are you doing here?

Finding an argument?

If the shoe fits...

You really stepped into that one...

Edited by Colbard, : can


This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by Theodoric, posted 11-14-2014 8:53 AM Theodoric has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Theodoric, posted 11-14-2014 9:37 PM Colbard has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 170 of 177 (741817)
11-14-2014 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by New Cat's Eye
11-14-2014 9:28 AM


Cat Sci writes:

You're clearly calling things crap because you don't understand them.

Do you have any evidence that I have called what you said "crap"?

This will be interesting...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by New Cat's Eye, posted 11-14-2014 9:28 AM New Cat's Eye has not yet responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 171 of 177 (741818)
11-14-2014 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by NoNukes
11-13-2014 3:09 PM


Nonukes writes:

That's right, martyr. You are the Jeanne d'Arc for the right to arrogantly express ignorance.

Do you have any evidence/proof that what I have posted is ignorance or is that just your opinion?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by NoNukes, posted 11-13-2014 3:09 PM NoNukes has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by NoNukes, posted 11-14-2014 10:40 PM Colbard has responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


Message 174 of 177 (741864)
11-15-2014 9:01 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by NoNukes
11-14-2014 10:40 PM


NoNukes writes:

yes. And I've already indicated the problems in responses to your posts.

I must have ignored it. That's rude and unfair.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by NoNukes, posted 11-14-2014 10:40 PM NoNukes has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by edge, posted 11-15-2014 2:00 PM Colbard has responded

  
Colbard
Member (Idle past 1810 days)
Posts: 300
From: Australia
Joined: 08-31-2014


(1)
Message 176 of 177 (741961)
11-15-2014 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by edge
11-15-2014 2:00 PM


I was saying I was rude and unfair for ignoring it.

If you're an American you would not understand self effacing humor, your ego's are too big.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by edge, posted 11-15-2014 2:00 PM edge has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by edge, posted 11-15-2014 11:49 PM Colbard has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020