Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0

Message 1 And I have more sense to click on those links. Don't you do it either. You might find that you get something you didn't want.

Looks like spam, but mike the wiz replied. Though he seemed bit suspicious, he otherwise gave it the benefit of the doubt, so I'll let it go unless someone can confirm those website's are hazardous. I won't be clicking on them myself.

Tumblr.com won't give you something you don't want. All those links lead to tumblr.com (wouldn't follow those links outside of tumblr, tho).

Message 1

I don't know what rule applies here if any but jar has asked the same tiresome question so many times now that I think it should be regarded as some kind of harassment, and I'm arbitrarily starting at Message 971:971, 975, 977, 986, 980, 991, 995, 998, 1003, 1040, 1064, 1071, 1073 and 1081The question has been dealt with sufficiently many times, my latest direct answer being Message 1067.Thank you for your attention to this.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

If this is a question already asked and answered then just tell me what was Jar's question and what was your answer?

His question is how does baking a wedding cake validate a marriage, and my answer has been all along that this is about a person's conscience, not an artificial equation between cake and validation. That's the only answer there is and it's been given over and over again on that thread. It obviously doesn't have that meaning for him but he can't make that decision for other people. It's the person's conscience that decides that to make such a cake is wrong because it would be supporting something that violates God's law.

Business do not have a conscience and the religious beliefs of employees does not allow the company to discriminate.In addition that issue was just one of two brought up and remaining unanswered. The other is :

quote:

---

How is saying "You can buy anything but a wedding cake" different than saying "You can buy anything in the store except at the white counter" or "You can ride anywhere on the bus as long as you don't sit in the front with the white folk" or "You can drink the water but not from the White faucet" or "No Jews need apply" or "Help wanted. no Irish need apply" or "You can use the outhouse but not the indoor toilet" ?

---

{This should not be here. 24 hour suspension. - Adminnemooseus}Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Message in red, concerning 24 hour suspension in regards of this message.

{Content hidden. Reply to a message that does not belong in this topic. Adminnemooseus}Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Content hidden message.

Hi Faith,Jar seems to be asking how denying a couple a wedding cake isn't a form of discrimination.Your answer seems to be that if denying a couple a wedding cake is a matter of personal conscience then it isn't discrimination. But Jar covered this. If denying access to the white water fountain is discrimination even if done out of personal conscience, then how is denying a couple a wedding cake not discrimination even if done out of personal conscience? I think this is the question Jar seeks an answer for.Jar can be cryptic at times, so in the interest of speeding things along I'm removing Jar's suspension so he can clarify if necessary. Please keep in mind, you and Jar, this isn't a discussion thread. In this thread you're just providing me information, not debating each other.

Yes, that is the question I am asking.

{Spam message content deleted. - Adminnemooseus}Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Guess.

Spam immediately upthread.

SpamEvC Forum: Information

Some of THEM moved in.aaratrikasharma76
kavinmarter{AdminNosy suspended two spammers and blanked the spam messages. I deleted the 5 spam messages. - Adminnemooseus}Edited by jar, : No reason given.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Note added.