Multiculturalism

Coyote is right, "multiculturalism" was the invention of Cultural Marxism (Frankfurt School of Social Research, otherwise known as "Critical Theory" ha ha), along with "homophobia" and the constant accusation of "racism" against their chosen enemies, mostly white Europeans, and the devaluation of patriarchal society in the name of hyperfeminist "theory," and the attack on authority (by Adorno), and the promotion of the Sexual Revolution with all its destructive consequences (by Marcuse), all with the aim of destroying Western Civilization. Hey, they've succeeded and they've even got you on their side, along with most of the regulars at EvC.

And what are YOUR credentials by which you expect us to take YOUR opinions seriously?

Your quote takes Roman Catholicism for Christian, but Roman Catholicism never was Christianity, it was an antichristian usurper that grew over time into the behemoth pagan system that murdered millions in the Inquisition and still continues to develop its pagan ways. THAT system has NEVER reformed and will never reform. Islam is doing the murdering these days, but allow the RCC the worldly power it continually seeks and you'll see it bare its fangs again too.Aquinas does not speak for Christianity but for pagan Rome, and his main inspiration was Aristotle, who continues to be taught in that pagan system, far more than anything biblical. It was the adherence to Aristotle that made a martyr of Galileo, not the Bible.The Protestant Reformation on the other hand was the RECOVERY OF TRUE CHRISTIANITY that the RCC had overshadowed for centuries. abe: The Protestant REformers considered the Waldensians along with the others persecuted by Rome, to have been protoProtestants and considered them Christian brothers.Abe: As for the last reference in that quote, there is good reason for religious uniformity in a society and the legal denial of rights to religions that seek domination over others, but this is not the same thing as persecution and murder.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

No, that's prescriptive. 'Cos of telling people what to do.

[citation needed]Now, do you want me to tell you what Christianity is?

No, dear, you take it out of context. The violence of Islam is prescriptive to today's readers, and Christianity is not, The Bible is descriptive of the prescriptive laws to Israel and not prescriptive to today's readers, and of course you know that is what was meant but you enjoy being perverse.

You wanted a citation for my remarks about Cultural Marxism. Here's a post I did on it at my blog not too long ago, in which you will find videos and other references.

You know what Faith? I really don't give a flying fart about what is and is not your definition of Christianity. As far as I'm concerned a rose by any other name still stinks of rose. The fact is that the thing that everybody else in the history of the world knows by the name of Christianity, was responsible for the same kind of crimes that are now being perpetrated in the name of Islam.The fact that even you, as a total zealot, recognise that it is wrong to murder people because of their beliefs is progress and is really strong evidence of my claim that Chritianity has been pacified. In the 16th century you, as a Christian, would have been first to light the bonfire under my atheistic arse.We need the same to happen to Islam.

Wish to propose to Admins that "flying fart" be censored from Tangle's post. Thank you./To Tangle: Besides that I'd comment that the know-nothing attitude expressed in this post does no service to your cause. Truth obviously doesn't matter to you.

Faith, I did not accuse you of being a flying fart - although,....no, let's not go there.Now then, I take it that other than denying that Christianity didn't exist until you came along to define it for us, you don't disagree that people that called themselves Christians behaved in some fairly disgraceful ways? And that they no longer do? How do you think that happened Faith? What was the process that changed people to that extent?Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

I don't expect you to accept my opinions without them bring backed with reason and evidence.
You know this is a piss poor attempt at changing the conversation.Now why should we accept anything this guy had to say? Do you have nothing to support your trust in him?

Oh I can certainly describe that process for you but you won't like it.First, it depends on where you're looking whether it's " no longer so." Catholics still persecute Christians in Mexico and other Catholic countries. It only gets reported in some Christian publications here and there though. The IRA up until recently was responsible for the violence in Ireland against the Protestants, and they've been behind all the violence in Ireland and elsewhere between Catholics and Protestants. I'm sure you've heard and believed the Catholic lies about it of course. There is also reason to believe the Inquisitional tortures have continued into the twentieth century in dungeons in Catholic institutions. One nun escaped back in the 50s to tell her story of incredible tortures and deaths in her convent before she mysteriously disappeared. And then there was Hitler's modeling of the Holocaust on the Inquisition, and the Pope's support of him. There were also the Catholic-promoted massacres in Rwanda and in the Balkans. Diem was also a Catholic.But the Catholic cause of such atrocities is suppressed and their history rewritten. The RCC has no Christian character whatever except in its superficial aspects, which fortunately for many Catholics is all they know; Otherwise, it's entirely a pagan religion that seeks to rule the world.I guess you could ask why on the surface things SEEM to have settled down overall? Well, apart from the fact that the continuing atrocities are simply redefined and kept from public view, it's due to the fact that there WAS a Protestant Reformation that came along and resurrected true Christianity from the lies of the RCC, and pointed out that the papacy is the Antichrist and the Inquisition nothing but evil antichristian murders.Historically the Reformation won, you see, so the RCC has had to back off and cloak their murderous intentions and try to look like sweet little lambs. But the signs are that their endless efforts to destroy Protestantism have been bearing their evil fruit and they may sooner than anybody can guess be able to call the Pope the ruler of the world.ABE: Oh, and of course you'll all call that Christianity. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

And this Faith, is why I'm an atheist and why I don't give a flying fart about who believes what about who is and who is not a 'Christian' - as they say here, TM - by your or anybody else's definition. The fact is that they all believed themselves to be whatever they called themselves and did what they did in the name of it.My only concern is the harm that these ludicrous beliefs can do and now it's very clear that all flavours of Christianity - no matter who defines them - are no longer anything like the problem they were to other faiths a few hundred years ago. For that we have rationalism and secular law to thank. Left to their own devices, religions would be as primitive and destructive as extreem Islam is today.Christianity has been tamed, Islam has not, yet.

It's your own know-nothing attitude that's going to bring the next wave of religious violence.

Where's your "reason and evidence" when you respond to a good article with PC ad hominem accusations against the publisher of "hate" and the like? Reason and evidence ha, you're just a typical PC monger.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.