Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ?
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 48 of 144 (703508)
07-23-2013 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Percy
07-16-2013 9:10 AM


Life in movement does not always happens naturally
-
quote:
Everything that has ever happened in the history of the universe for which we have evidence has happened naturally, and so science believes that the origin of life occurred naturally. Other than that science has only hypotheses about abiogenesis and no firm theories.
It might take some time for one to bring up a sign ( or perhaps an evidence ) that 'the origin of life ( or the movement in which life is generated ) does not occur naturally
since 'All things are possible to him that investigate .. .. some new possibilities ..'
-

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Percy, posted 07-16-2013 9:10 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 07-24-2013 7:46 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 51 of 144 (744791)
12-15-2014 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Percy
07-24-2013 7:46 AM


Emanation of Life Energy is what best explains. - Creationism leads to Crazyness
-
Percy, the light emanates of itself, so the life energy emanates of itself. The visible light was not created. Life was not created.
Every person is a different reality, every person is a Primary life energy that is living not in a fragmentary way, Human life is emanating an independent realm, an alternate reality, because the light, or life energy in electrical form does not depend from being created. The light rises and appears in our Human form, otherwise the Light returns to the source.
-

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 07-24-2013 7:46 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Tanypteryx, posted 12-15-2014 7:45 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 59 by Percy, posted 12-16-2014 8:01 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 53 of 144 (744793)
12-15-2014 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by RAZD
07-02-2013 2:57 PM


Inconsistency of data causes Evolutionary theory to go into extinction
-
RAZD, Evolutionary theory (in regards to the origin of the Human body) has been proven inconsistent.
The proof of Inconsistency in the Evolutionary theory has been provided by a List of numbers proposed by many men or representatives from their archeological institutes.
quote:
The Surrealist Intervals’ anomaly
The following was based on numbers proposed by the Evolutionary theory:
55 thousand years ago: 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 90 % = 2,000 people
50 thousand years ago: 1,700 x 10 = 17,000 - 90 % = 1,700 p
45 thousand years ago: 2,500 x 10 = 25,000 - 90 % = 2,500 p
40 thousand years ago: 3,500 x 10 = 35,000 - 90 % = 3,500 p
35 thousand years ago: 5,000 x 10 = 50,000 - 90 % = 5,000 p
The finals ( the totals ) can be changed and they still indicate global termination occurring from a thousand years to another. ♯ ♯ ♯ — Anomaly has been found — Every 5,000 years the number of children would be the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years interval. Another anomaly is not seeing it.
During the 5,000 years intervals, from 55 to 35 thousand years ago, the time that the population would multiply on a regular basis equates to 250 years.
Average of years without multiplying: 4,750 years per every 5,000 years.
See through this point of view:
________________________________ 5,000 years interval ______________________________
|___________ p x 10 - 90 % ________|_______ multiplication rate _____________|
|_______________ 4,750 years ___________|_______ regular basis: 250 years __________|
That is why the problem is not about a constant decrease allegedly caused by a variety of factors which do not explain the lack of consistency in the Evolutionary theory. The anomaly is the impossibility that their population reductions could have happened in a measure that corresponds to 4,750 years without multiplying, per every 5,000 years. Because Human beings do multiply according to a regular basis which was not taken into consideration when the time proposed for their multiplication had been given by the Evolutionary theory.
Brief Summarized Signature
Real life Vs too pessimistic archeological surrealism
As certain as Die Hard, a pet kangaroo rat, has always an ace in the sleeve, ( whether the kangaroo rat bluffs or not ), it's only with a chronological basis that equates to 4,750 years without multiplying per every 5,000 years, that it would be possible for people in Europe to have taken 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.
If the number of children would be the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years interval within the rows of 5,000 years from 55 to 35,000 years ago then there's still the option of stop drifting on numbers as if man is a beast, and as if everything that happens in life is a disgrace. That kind of chronological basis surpasses far beyond Hardy Har Har, a depressed, gloomy pessimistic hyena, always saying, 'I just know it's all going to go wrong'.
In Human Origins the ascertained truth of the facts has been constantly synthesized to an excessive and over exaggerated dependence on farming activity since it wasn't a fundamental condition for Humans to grow and multiply but just one of the options they chose. Let’s not talk about farming and agricultural technology as if 55,000 families of European fishermen, who never chose to do anything different, would depend so much on changing their fishing into agricultural activities so that they continued to grow and multiply.
For this reason many graphs that are made as alleged evidence of accuracy of the Evolutionary theory for Human origins do not show numbers of fishermen as they do with farming since fishermen in Europe could increase from 1,000 to 50,000 people in the least per every thousand years. Time for seeing beyond the spoon: The more children a farmer had, the more labor force was available for them to increase the production of the farm. Given the lack of technology in those days, the population growth was a solution and not a problem.
Observation shows that when Humans spread to a territory, this fact does not originate groups of different languages and ethnies. To the contrary, it brings miscegenation and then causes some languages and ethnies to disappear. That the sets of groups did not spread to Europe during the time proposed for their multiplication by the Evolutionary theory, is that which is ascertained by elimination.
According to Echoes in the words ‘No one called us to the land’, the appearance of these sets of groups in Europe occurred simultaneously. There is still the open road to new discoveries: That 42 different Linguistic Ethnic groups were previously selected by intelligent designer is the only possibility that was not proved wrong. That is why, by elimination, you ascertain they were brought to the land all at one time, otherwise Europe would be one miscegenated people.
Albanians Crimean Tatars Germanic people Portuguese
Armenians Croats Greeks Romanians
Aromanians Czech Hungarians Russian
Basques Dutch Igbo people Scottish
Belarusians Estonian Irish people Slovenes
Ethnic groups in Belgium Finnish Italians Spanish people
Bosniaks French Latvians Swedes
British people Gaelic Lithuanians Swiss
Bulgarians Georgians Macedonian Turks
Celts German people Netherlands Ukrainians
Cossacks Polish
Source: Wikipedia, European Ethnic group Templates
Europe isn't so large that it could originate so much different languages and ethnies through the miscegenation, the mixing involved in the Evolutionary theory. All of non-Russian Europe fits into the map of Brazil where the language became one. Evolutionary theory implies that the miscegenation in Europe would have taken place for a time longer than 25,000 years. Turning back to real European life, people take a walk and in awhile they are spread all over the hills and far away.
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 07-02-2013 2:57 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Coyote, posted 12-15-2014 8:28 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 57 by RAZD, posted 12-15-2014 9:51 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 55 of 144 (744799)
12-15-2014 8:33 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Tanypteryx
12-15-2014 7:45 PM


Re: Emanation of Life Energy is what best explains. - Creationism leads to Crazyness
You know, it is not emition of light. It's emanation of light. Anyway, good job!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Tanypteryx, posted 12-15-2014 7:45 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 56 of 144 (744800)
12-15-2014 9:00 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Coyote
12-15-2014 8:28 PM


Re: Inconsistency of data causes Evolutionary theory to go into extinction
Dear Coyote, people finally see by observing real life that it’s impossible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken a time longer than ten thousand years to reach 1 million.
Of course it is impossible. Would you perhaps state otherwise?
So why not see that the Evolutionary theory (in regards to the origin of the human body) has been stating that 'it would have taken over 55 thousand years for Humans to increase from 2,000 to 1 million'?
Can anyone see that many men are telling lies here?
And why they are telling lies,
Because you know there is a rank of what matters more, regardless of a mistake on progress.
quote:
Specific reasons why not see when a theory becomes archaic and obsolete:
1st Sponsorships and financial support to Universities ought not to be lost. 2nd The Institutes’ reputation ought not to be damaged. 3rd The sales of many books must continue without damages. 4th As teacher on Human origins you must keep your job.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Coyote, posted 12-15-2014 8:28 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Coyote, posted 12-15-2014 11:07 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 60 of 144 (745210)
12-20-2014 12:35 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Percy
12-16-2014 8:01 AM


Re: Emanation of Life Energy is what best explains. - Creationism leads to Crazyness
The term Primary Energy implies that the energy is a extension from one Primary source,
There is no second source nor second genealogical root.
Primary is an entire sequence, an extension from one root, or a Primary genealogical tree: the energy of life in every person is an extension of the same energy of life through which that person was generated.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Percy, posted 12-16-2014 8:01 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by NoNukes, posted 12-20-2014 1:12 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 63 by Percy, posted 12-20-2014 7:46 AM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 62 of 144 (745217)
12-20-2014 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by NoNukes
12-20-2014 1:12 AM


Re: Emanation of Life Energy is what best explains. - Creationism leads to Crazyness
Message was re-edited for you,
The term Primary Energy implies that the energy is a extension from one Primary source,
There is no second source nor second genealogical root.
Therefore, there is no secondary life energy.
Primary is an entire sequence, an extension from one root, or a Primary genealogical tree: the energy of life in every person is an extension of the same energy of life through which that person was generated.
-

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by NoNukes, posted 12-20-2014 1:12 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by NoNukes, posted 12-20-2014 11:47 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 65 of 144 (752842)
03-13-2015 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Coyote
12-15-2014 8:28 PM


It didn't fly then but now your theory is probably under attack
-
It didn't fly then because the contents 'written on the outside and sealed within' were just a manuscript,
but you can't say it can't fly now if it becomes published,
since all good things that are published go flying around the world.
*
Quotes from Spotlight: How to entangle a juridical panthera,
*
There is a disconnection of time and place which is verified from the incompatibility between the consequences of having Humans on Europe for a time no longer than 14,000 years and the time proposed for their multiplication by the Evolutionary theory. It will be seen that all things the Humans have done to the place called Earth during a single season of 7,000 years; they would have done the same thing anyway during any of three seasons of 14,000 years that immediately precede the recent 7 thousand years.
It's only with a chronological basis that equates to 4,750 years without multiplying per every 5,000 years, that it would be possible for people in Europe to have taken 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.
If the number of children would be the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years interval within the rows of 5,000 years from 55 to 35,000 years ago then there's still the option of stop drifting on numbers as if man is a beast, and as if everything that happens in life is a disgrace.
Evidence of Simultaneity is that 42 linguistic ethnic groups did not spread to Europe during the time proposed by the Evolutionary theory ( for Human Origins ) otherwise Europe would be one miscegenated people even before they could become 42 Linguistic Ethnic groups.
The possibility that has not been proven wrong is that the sets of groups were brought to the land simultaneously, all at one time.
On the other hand the fragments from skeletons of mammal specimens that became extinct do not prove that they evolved. Observation shows that whenever mammal specimens disappear they cease from existing for becoming extinct.
*
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Quotes from Spotlight: How to Entangle a Juridical Panthera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Coyote, posted 12-15-2014 8:28 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by frako, posted 03-13-2015 6:57 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 68 by herebedragons, posted 03-14-2015 7:32 AM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 67 of 144 (752864)
03-13-2015 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by frako
03-13-2015 6:57 PM


Re: It didn't fly then but now your theory is probably under attack
-
Frako,
The population growth models are not referring to native Americans, or aboriginals in Australia.
The population growth models are referring to Europe and European people.
------- Quotation from 'written on the outside and sealed within':
... that there were no families of Humans multiplying on the Earth 25,000 years ago is evident
since the population growth models have demonstrated that all things the European people have done to the place called Europe during a single cluster of 7 thousand years,
they would have done the same thing anyway during any of three sequences of 14 thousand years that immediately precede the recent 7,000 years.
-

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by frako, posted 03-13-2015 6:57 PM frako has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by frako, posted 03-14-2015 10:00 AM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 70 of 144 (757958)
05-17-2015 3:00 AM


Average of years without multiplying: 4,750 per 5,000
You better see ( beyond the spoon )
it is the ascertained truth of the facts,
Quote:
It's only with a completely surrealist Chronological model like the one proposed by the Evolutionary theory to populations growth: that equates to 4,750 years without multiplying per every 5,000 years, that it could be possible for people in Europe to have taken 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.
The Evolution theory, in regards to the origin of the Human body, looks really bad because its chronological proposal to populations growth is proven to be an extremely serious error.
( From: Written on the outside and extremely encrypted )
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by ringo, posted 08-23-2015 2:20 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 71 of 144 (766842)
08-22-2015 2:04 PM


Evolutionary theory mathematically proven to be inconsistent
*
Hello,
I hoped some teachers of Human origins could explain with numbers or estimates.
What we have seen so far, statements, not numbers nor estimates, which equate to saying that '.. there were many people in Europe 30,000 years ago ..'
and 'many' is word that only keeps us guessin'. It is not Math or estimates nor science.
*
In order for us to state and consider that the evolutionary explanation ( for the origin of the Human body ) is accurate,
the teachers of Human origins must be able to explain with numbers or estimates,
instead of statements only,
How did Humans grow and multiply 35 thousand years ago with a CONSTANT of 90 % of decrease or without having increased, which equates to Global Extermination taking place from a thousand years to another ?
*
EVIDENCE OF ANOMALY IN THE THEORY
*
With regards to the origin of the Human body, the Evolutionary theory has been mathematically proven to be inconsistent
Because, according to the numbers / estimates provided by the institutes of archeology the rate of multiplication that the population would have increased from 55,000 years equates to: p x 10 - 90 %
*
55 thousand years ago: 2,000
50 thousand years ago: 1,700
45 thousand years ago: 2,500
40 thousand years ago: 3,500
35 thousand years ago: 5,000
*
55 thousand years ago: 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 90 % = 2,000 people
50 thousand years ago: 1,700 x 10 = 17,000 - 90 % = 1,700 p
45 thousand years ago: 2,500 x 10 = 25,000 - 90 % = 2,500 p
40 thousand years ago: 3,500 x 10 = 35,000 - 90 % = 3,500 p
35 thousand years ago: 5,000 x 10 = 50,000 - 90 % = 5,000 p
*
The finals ( the totals ) can be changed and they still indicate global extermination occurring from a thousand years to another. ♯ ♯ ♯ — Anomaly has been found — Every 5,000 years the number of children would be the same from the beginning to the end of every 4,750 years interval. Another anomaly is not seeing it.
*
quote:
*
Quotes from SPOTLIGHT: How to Entangle a Juridical Panthera,
*
During the 5,000 years intervals, from 55 to 35 thousand years ago, the time that the population would multiply on a regular basis equates to 250 years.
Average of years without multiplying: 4,750 years per every 5,000 years. ( According to the multiplication rate proposed by the Evolutionary theory )
That is why the problem is not about a constant decrease allegedly caused by a variety of factors which do not explain the lack of consistency in the Evolutionary theory, in regards to the origin of the Human body.
The anomaly is the impossibility that their population reductions could have happened in a measure that corresponds to 4,750 years without multiplying, per every 5,000 years. Because Human beings do multiply according to a regular basis which was not taken into consideration when the time proposed for their multiplication had been given by the Evolutionary theory.
*
You can figure out the average based on the population that evolution describes. So, if you want to disprove evolution you calculate the average then show how that calculated value is.
Every person can figure out the average based on numbers that the Evolutionary theory had proposed for Humans to grow and multiply.
That is how you know and ascertain that teachers on Human origins are not able to disprove that the average or multiplication rate proposed by the Evolutionary theory is proven to be mathematically impossible.
Because the average of years without multiplying corresponds to 4,750 years per every 5,000 years, during two rows of 14,000 years from 49 to 21 thousand years ago.
*
You can see there is no argument to explain why Humans would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.
That is the anomaly of the Evolutionary proposal. And there is nothing you can do to solve the problem, unless you could prove that it is possible for Humans to stop multiplying during 4,750 years per every 5,000 years interval.
It is not fair nor professional to believe or trust in the word of archeologists regardless of the fact that they must and should explain why the list of numbers they provide does indicate global termination occurring from a thousand years to another.
You were given power of intelligent mind to see and understand what science is: the ascertained truth of the facts; that which you are able to demonstrate by the means of experience.
*
The real science: the truth of the facts by the means of Real life experiences have already demonstrated that the Human beings do multiply according to a regular basis,
that can not be less than population x 15 - 80 % otherwise you are proposing more decrease than increase.
The average of multiplication p x 10/15 - 90 is the actual rate of multiplication that has been proposed by financially supported institutes, surrealist archeologists who are paid to tell the approximate info and data that their sponsors would like to hear,
Mathematically p x 10/15 - 90 is the rate of multiplication that is proposed by any and every theory that places Human beings in Europe 35,000 years ago.
A regular average of multiplication corresponds to a very basic population growth model, which was not taken into consideration when the time proposed for their multiplication had been given by the Evolutionary theory.
quote:
*
Population x 15 - 80 % per every thousand years is the lowest rate of population increase. 4 from every 5 inhabitants do not multiply. It's a model that reproduces the chaos, a state of miser and very bad conditions to population increase. Eighty percent of Humans were terminated or died because of wars, famines, diseases and other events and they've left no descendants.
Even when only the Fifth part survives you get 9,565,938,000 people in the end of 14 thousand years.
*
Population growth Sample / Model: Thin Red Line
Multiplication rate: 1 to 15 people - 80 % per every thousand years.
2nd cluster of 14 thousand years — From 35,000 years ago
European population: 2,000 people ( according to the Evolutionary theory )
*
1 thousand years |........ 2,000 x 15 = 30,000 - 80 %= 6,000 people
2 thousand years |........ 6,000 x 15 = 90,000 - 80 %= 18,000 p
3 thousand years |....... 18,000 x 15 = 270,000 - 80 %= 54,000 p
4 thousand years |....... 54,000 x 15 = 810,000 - 80 %= 162,000 p
5 thousand years |...... 162,000 x 15 = 2,430,000 - 80 %= 486,000 p
6 thousand years |...... 486,000 x 15 = 7,290,000 - 80 %= 1,458,000 p
7 thousand years |.... 1,458,000 x 15 = 21,870,000 - 80 %= 4,374,000 p
*
8 thousand years |.... 4,374,000 x 15 = 65,610,000 - 80 %= 13,122,000 p
9 thousand years |... 13,122,000 x 15 = 196,830,000 - 80 %= 39,366,000 p
10 thousand years |.. 39,366,000 x 15 = 590,490,000 - 80 %= 118,098,000 p
11 thousand years |. 118,098,000 x 15 = 1,771,470,000 - 80 %= 354,294,000 p
12 thousand years | 354,294,000 x 15 = 5,314,410,000 - 80 %= 1,062,882,000 p
13 thousand years | 1,062,882,000 x 15 = 15,943,230,000 - 80 %= 3,188,646,000
14 thousand years | 3,188,646,000 x 15 = 47,829,690,000 - 80 %= 9,565,938,000
*
Evolutionary theory implies that the miscegenation in Europe would have started when they were 2,000 people. However, 2,000 people in Europe do not become 42 different linguistic ethnic groups through the means of miscegenation.
*
*
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : updates
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Even when only the Fifth part survives you get 9,565,938,000 people in the end of 14 thousand years.

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-23-2015 3:17 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 74 of 144 (766910)
08-23-2015 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by ringo
08-23-2015 2:20 PM


It is mathematically proven to be inconsistent but money speaks louder than Math
*
I hoped you ever heard of lowest possible rate of multiplication for Humans to grow and multiply,
because the Evolutionary explanation ( with regards to the origin of the Human body ) depends on it.
*
But you know money speaks louder than Math,
The best fish does not go to your home. You must go and bring the fish to your home.
Also archeologists do not go to your home for free.
If they are able to tell you lies then you ascertain with Math and know that they've lied to you,
because they did not come to tell you about datas for free or just because they like you.
They were sponsored, supported and paid by those who believe that evolution is what best explains the origin of the Human body. And whoever needs to sell books about the subject, and whoever needs to get paid for teaching Human origins according to Evolution.
Money has spoken about the importance and accuracy of surrealist datas provided by the respective organized/sponsored institutes.
*
quote:
Quoted from topix evolution debate,
*
When you act like believers then you simply believe that it's mathematically possible for 2,000 people in Europe to have taken more than 25,000 years to reach 1 million, which equates to p x 10/15 - 90 % ( per every thousand years ),
and it means neither decrease nor increase during 4,750 years per every row of 5,000 years.
That is why you believe that p x 15 - 80 percent per every thousand years is not the lowest possible multiplication rate for Humans to grow and multiply.
*
The blind leads the blind and Mary go after the other Maries.
*
*
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Sponsored, supported and paid by those who believe that evolution is what best explains the origin of the Human body. And whoever needs to sell books about the subject, and whoever needs to get paid for teaching Human origins according to Evolution.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : The best fish does not go to your home. You must go and bring the fish to your home. Also archeologists do not go to your home for free.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by ringo, posted 08-23-2015 2:20 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-23-2015 7:14 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 76 by ringo, posted 08-24-2015 11:48 AM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 78 of 144 (767053)
08-25-2015 3:01 PM


Important: For All Posters ( & Readers ) The One Million Dollar Question
*
Is there a lowest possible rate of multiplication for Humans to grow and multiply ?
*
Pro/For: Yes
*
Con/Against: No
*
Pro/For: The correct answer is Yes because there are samples of lowest possible rate: population x 15 - 80 % per every thousand years.
*
Con/Against: It really doesn't matter since Evolution is not about that.
*
The correct answer implies about whether the Evolutionary explanation ( with regards to the origin of the Human body ) is consistent or not.
*
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : The correct answer implies about whether the Evolutionary explanation ( with regards to the origin of the Human body ) is consistent or not.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Pro/For: The correct answer is Yes because there are samples of lowest possible rate: population x 15 - 80 % per every thousand years.

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 08-26-2015 12:36 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 82 by ringo, posted 08-26-2015 12:39 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 80 of 144 (767101)
08-26-2015 2:43 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by Phat
08-26-2015 12:36 AM


Re: Important: For All Posters ( & Readers ) The One Million Dollar Question
*
Hello Phat,
What say you,
Is there a lowest possible rate of multiplication for Humans to grow and multiply ?
*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 08-26-2015 12:36 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-26-2015 11:45 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1152 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 83 of 144 (767192)
08-26-2015 7:26 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by New Cat's Eye
08-26-2015 11:45 AM


Re: Important: For All Posters ( & Readers ) The One Million Dollar Question
*
Hello Cat Sci, I hope all is well,
The question is about possibility. It is like asking you, What is the lowest possible rate for Humans to keep on growing and multiplying.
Therefore, the answer to the Million Dollar Question is not zero or negative since zero or negative is not growing nor multiplying either.
*
Have a good job.
*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-26-2015 11:45 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-26-2015 9:38 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024