Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   In the beginning
Philip
Member (Idle past 4750 days)
Posts: 656
From: Albertville, AL, USA
Joined: 03-10-2002


Message 46 of 51 (67615)
11-19-2003 12:19 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by sidelined
11-19-2003 12:15 AM


Re: Dogmatic speculations?
I think it had to do with something small or atomic, or perhaps his peanut inventions ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by sidelined, posted 11-19-2003 12:15 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by sidelined, posted 11-19-2003 9:26 AM Philip has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 47 of 51 (67619)
11-19-2003 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Philip
11-19-2003 12:17 AM


Re: Dogmatic speculations?
I don't get it at all?????

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Philip, posted 11-19-2003 12:17 AM Philip has not replied

  
Quiz
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 51 (67622)
11-19-2003 12:36 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Philip
11-19-2003 12:13 AM


Re: I thought this was simple?
Genesis 1-2:3 "This is the spiritual creation" as stated in 2:4-6, then Genesis 2:7-25 is the physical creation. The condition of the earth was a spiritual condition at which point it stats in chapter 2:7 that God caused it to rain and he formed man, then he formed everything else and so on. I suggest that from this point in history natural selection took over and certain species which could not exist died off and maybe some new species were formed during this time. We can call this microevolution. Some would suggest macroevolution which is a horizontal change, but I suggest microevolution which is a vertical change. take for example the fossil record, some say it supports bacterian to man theory, it shows appes and such, that would be called macroevolution. I dont agree with this theory. I agree a vertical change occured, which means after God had created everything, same animal groups which could mate together created new species. Natural selection removed the lesser species from the earth after that.
Quiz
[This message has been edited by Quiz, 11-19-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Philip, posted 11-19-2003 12:13 AM Philip has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 49 of 51 (67675)
11-19-2003 9:26 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Philip
11-19-2003 12:19 AM


Re: Dogmatic speculations?
Philip
Doubtless, hell is full of Einteins and little-Einsteins for having squandered their lives in foolish vanity, worshipping and serving the creature more than the creator.
I was not aware you knew Einstein personally and could make such a rash appraisal.What a huge hypocrisy on your part that you would presume to know how God would judge Einstein.
And then you make some vague reference to deadly inventions again refering to Einstein which I called you on to which I recieve this?
I think it had to do with something small or atomic, or perhaps his peanut inventions ...
Go out of character and be honest now. You really have no clue what you are talking about here do you? You lost not only a whole lot of respect through this blatant ad hominem attack on a great man but also a great deal of personal integrity.Get a grip on reality okay?
------------------
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Philip, posted 11-19-2003 12:19 AM Philip has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 50 of 51 (68468)
11-21-2003 9:08 PM


BUMP!

  
AlmostBlue
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 51 (75375)
12-27-2003 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by RebWlmJames
11-03-2003 5:59 PM


Re: Genesis 1.1 BeReishit Bara
In support of RebWil's comment on the 1st two verses of Gen being one long run-on sentence, namely: "In the beginning of God's creating the heavens and the earth, when the earth was (still) unformed and shapeless and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the spirit of Gd hovered over the face of the waters, Gd said let there be light, and there was light," allow me to point out the following: the common translation of Gen 1:2 begins "(Now/And) the earth was unformed and void..." In Hebrew the words (Now/And) the earth was is rendered as "veHa'aretz Hayeta". This is a very unusual construction. Normally the wording would be "vaTehi Ha'Aretz" where the verb (was)would be prefaced by the tense-reversing letter VaV preceding the noun (earth). Our verse begins with the noun first, followed by the verb in pure past tense. This unusual construction supports the idea that verse 2 does not stand alone but is a run-on from verse 1. (See Rashi and Anchor Bible)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by RebWlmJames, posted 11-03-2003 5:59 PM RebWlmJames has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024