|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Oh No, The New Awesome Primary Thread | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4443 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
This is one of the things about our political system that I see as really messed up. I agree this is pretty messed up, but the most totally fucked up part is after putting up with the stupidity of primaries and finally a national election, we have the electoral count that chooses the president instead of total votes. No wonder only idiots and narcissist psychotics run.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined:
|
There is nothing stupid about the electoral college system, it's the only thing that preserves the integrity of the individual states that we have left; otherwise the low population states would just be swallowed up completely in the federal behemoth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4443 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.0
|
I disagree.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Tanypteryx writes:
but the most totally fucked up part is after putting up with the stupidity of primaries and finally a national election, we have the electoral count that chooses the president instead of total votes. Is the population ratio to number of representatives fixed in the Constitution as it is today (about 758k per Rep)? We could double the number of Representatives by halving the the population ratio down to 376k, increasing the districts (which may have a side effect of ameliorating the gerrymandering badness). This would cut the power of Wyoming's 2 senators for it's Electoral College count in half. Kinda like the NRA arguing for more guns, I suppose, because we'd get 435 more Congress persons. Would this require an amendment to the Constitution?- xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
it's the only thing that preserves the integrity of the individual states that we have left; "The only thing"? That's a bit of hyperbole. Enough to render the bit of truth in the statement a mere shadow of the what you intend. Yes, the formula for the electoral college does give the small states a little extra 'political kick' by giving them a disproportionate number of electoral votes. But in practice the boost scarcely matters and we get the same president we would get with a direct popular vote. Of course I can think of one very notable exception that does not make your case very well. And with regards to the "only" part, we should note that the senate is completely state-egalitarian with respect to its election. And there is the important distinction that each state actually does get its two senators, while with the president, if you back a loser you get nothing. Finally, there is the tenth and eleventh amendments and federalism. Those things also ameliorate the domination of the states by the federal government. Every state has its own state government and its own legislature. Many people both left and right find that state tyranny is every bit as real and in their face as federal tyranny. Historically, it has been often been the states that trod all over individual rights and the federal government that cleans up their evil. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Je Suis Charlie Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
which may have a side effect of ameliorating the gerrymandering badness Smaller districts are even easier to gerrymander than large districtsJe Suis Charlie Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diomedes Member Posts: 996 From: Central Florida, USA Joined:
|
Historically, it has been often been the states that trod all over individual rights and the federal government that cleans up their evil. Exactly true. Slavery. Civil rights. Gay rights. When left to their own devices, states essentially gravitate towards mob rule. They often discount the Constitution (both State AND Federal) by pushing forward legislation that often goes counter to the foundational freedoms of our Republic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1531 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
The pubs will lose.
Not because they are evil, but because they can not re-brand fast enough."You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ramoss Member (Idle past 639 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
I will have to rethink my position on that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 311 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Speaking to the Texas Tribune on Tuesday, Cruz said that contemporary global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat-Earthers. You know it used to be it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier, he said. There are so many fish in that barrel there's no room for the water.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
There is nothing ****** about the electoral college system, it's the only thing that preserves the integrity of the individual states that we have left; otherwise the low population states would just be swallowed up completely in the federal behemoth. Curiously I agree on this. More to the point I think that we could use the electoral college to better effect if we made it illegal to release the state ballot results until it is done in the electoral college. This would take away the media circus election night and give reason for western states - especially Hawaii - people to vote, AND it would give states a chance to fix election fiascos (think Florida in 2000) by re-running their election ... and we could require a revote whenever the margin between the top two candidates was less than the number of other votes (either discarded\damaged or for a third party). Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8554 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
More to the point I think that we could use the electoral college to better effect if we made it illegal to release the state ballot results until it is done in the electoral college. I understand the point you are trying to make but a rather substantial quibble here. When you go into the booth and vote for president you are, in actuality, voting for the slate of Electors pledged to vote for that candidate if elected to the Electoral College. In most states the majority popular vote will determine which slate of Electors will enter the Electoral College. In two states the slate of Electors may be split. The only way to determine which slate of electors will enter the college is by tallying the popular vote. You cannot have the Electoral College release the state voting result since the college has not yet been formed and cannot be formed until the results are released. That cannot be done in a media vacuum. Also, the Florida situation came about because the Florida courts, the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida legislature attempted to resolve their voting fiasco by invalidating parts of the Florida election code in place at the time after the election had commenced. Any change to the Electoral College system, even it's repeal, would not have resolved the Florida election problem. To maintain the distribution of political influence to the states with the Electoral College scheme yet give the appearance, at least, of a more popular election, one new scheme is to do away with this slate of electors stuff and award that state's X number of votes to the popular winner in that state. Exactly what we have now but without all this falderal of having electors meet, sending their votes in sealed envelopes to the Senate to be opened and counted thus giving a result we already know has happened. All that would be needed is for the state to certify their result to the Federal Election Commission who would certify the final count, which, barring another Florida, could be done the day after the election.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
When you go into the booth and vote for president you are, in actuality, voting for the slate of Electors pledged to vote for that candidate if elected to the Electoral College. In most states the majority popular vote will determine which slate of Electors will enter the Electoral College. ... Curiously the constitution (as currently amended) only requires that :
quote: Note that this part of the process takes place within each state, and what they provide is a list of the votes for all the candidates with the numbers of votes for each candidate -- ie first choice, second choice, third choice, etc. for the state as a whole. This does not require a media circus, nor does it require that the results be released at that time. It is at this point that any problems with the voting -- as occurred in Florida -- would become evidence. Also at this time it should become apparent whether or not there is a clear and unambiguous count of votes, where the margins between the top three candidates are greater than the number of bad ballots. There is no need for announcing any votes from any state at this time, just whether or not a clean and unambiguous vote had been tallied, and IF not, then there is time to have a run-off election between the top three candidates (see below - "... the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for ... "). Note that this withholding of results from the media is already done for absentee votes and for early votes (where those are allowed). You also have time to validate all votes, a process that should (imho) include a means for the people to validate that their votes have been properly counted, and corrections made where they aren't properly counted. Then you can proceed to the "electoral college" as required by the constitution(*):
quote: Note that at this point onward the presence of electors is not required, just the votes they have tallied, and that this could be interpreted to mean, or at least to allows, that the lists of votes are all counted as popular votes. Note also that there does not need to be a >50% majority in any state, just in the final tally of the "electoral college" joint session.
... In two states the slate of Electors may be split. The only way to determine which slate of electors will enter the college is by tallying the popular vote. You cannot have the Electoral College release the state voting result since the college has not yet been formed and cannot be formed until the results are released. That cannot be done in a media vacuum. The "electoral college" is not actually a thing required or established by the constitution. What is required is that the electors compile lists of votes and forward those to the president of the Senate, and that the votes are then opened and counted in a joint session of the House and Senate, and if all the votes tallied on the lists provided by the electors are counted then you have de facto a popular vote tally ... with no need for a constitutional amendment. This joint session would be the media circus event, not the all night circus we currently have. And if you start by counting the smallest states first, you can make as much drama out of this as you want. This can also be implemented state by state without affecting the outcome. What this does is utilize the existing constitutional provisions to provide a buffer period to properly count and validate votes, time within which a second election can be held if the first one is problematic, and it provides a path for all popular votes to be counted in the final tally. Now I also think that ALL ballots should be paper ballots, the same ballots that are used for absentee voting and early voting and the period of voting should be the same as for absentee and early voting (ie -- everyone votes by absentee ballot). And I would like to see ballots with first choice and second choice voting, including a "non-of-the-above" option. This too can be implemented state by state without affecting the outcome. Finally, as this is the "Awesome Primary Thread" I think that all primaries should be done with instant run-off ballots (ie - you vote for the order of the list of candidates by your preferences from best to worst). This too can be implemented state by state. By focusing on steps that can be taken state by state then we don't have to depend on congress fixing itself. These steps can also be promoted by voter initiatives in each state, bringing the process to the people. Enjoy______ * -- per Amendment 12 from this point to end of quotes. by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
What would all this accomplish?
Love your enemies!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
a fair counting of the popular vote and the inclusion of all voters in the process and reduction of voting machine fraud.
Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024