What appears to be more likely given the difficult to manufacture evidence that Obama was actually born in the US (absent a time machine),
I don't doubt that he was born in Hawaii.
and the statements from the agent that they did not check the information with Obama?
That's what I'm doubting. I don't see how you could be ignorant of the bio that your literary agency is using. If anything, you'd probably have to be supplying them with the information.
Perhaps they thought that portraying him as being from Kenya would help with his book sales?
Seriously, given that the real constitutional issue almost certainly does not center around the location of Obama's birth anyway, isn't the real point to this question one of whether Obama is not 'one of us'? Isn't that exactly what your question of 'he's willing to say he was [born in Kenya?]' is getting at?
Not at all.
How about if you establish the pre-requisite point first, and then I consider your misplaced impugning?
All the rebuttals to the literary agency stuff has been about them admitting their error. I just didn't see anyone considering that Obama would have probably been in on it.
Which would mean that he lied about it, that's all. Its not that big of a deal.
Ha! just joking...
™ Version 4.2
(1)