Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9073 total)
70 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, Tangle (3 members, 67 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,348 Year: 4,460/6,534 Month: 674/900 Week: 1/197 Day: 1/30 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Open-minded Skepticism
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3851
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 2.9


(4)
Message 41 of 85 (759357)
06-10-2015 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by mikechell
06-10-2015 2:29 PM


Re: Skepticism is a good thing !!!
Hi, Mike--my turn to welcome you and admire your fish. I was on South Cape Cod Beach last week watching surfcasters throw 2 and 3-foot bluefish back...

Their freezers were full, they said. The bastards.

Facts are concrete ... what you believe does not change the facts.

What you believe can change your body. Those changes can impact you and the world around you dramatically.

Circumstantial evidence might be interpreted incorrectly ... factual evidence cannot, no matter what you believe.

Surely you don't mean that literally: we are regularly treated here to the misinterpretation of factual evidence.

I agree with MrHambre that facts are socially/culturally determined.

Whose perceptual apparatus and mindset should be used to determine which "facts" are cast in concrete? Sadly, we lack an heroic "Objective Man" and have to settle for a consensus arrived at by best methods and efforts, all of them falling short of the Glory of Fact.


"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by mikechell, posted 06-10-2015 2:29 PM mikechell has taken no action

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3851
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 44 of 85 (759365)
06-10-2015 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by mikechell
06-10-2015 7:22 PM


Re: new and confused ... who is E and who is C
new and confused ... who is E and who is C

Even scientists of great integrity can disagree about the interpretation of apparent facts.

For your EvC bestiary:

I'm a strong atheist who experiences what religious folk would consider mystical transports. I figure, meh, temporal lobe bonus. I could be wrong.

And an evilutionist, of course.

What makes a fact a fact, Mike?


"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by mikechell, posted 06-10-2015 7:22 PM mikechell has taken no action

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3851
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 2.9


(3)
Message 57 of 85 (759446)
06-11-2015 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by mikechell
06-11-2015 6:42 AM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
Nobody wants your surrender, Mike. We just want to challenge your ideas. The more vigorously you defend them, the better.

When a poster gets a bunch of challenging posts, we call it a dog pile: anyone here any length of time has enjoyed that disheartening experience.

Fresh perspectives are not just welcome here, they're vitally important.

Don't go away mad. Don't go away at all.


"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 6:42 AM mikechell has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022