Does science function to supress knowledge of God and God's work?

I am still Creationist, so the answer is NO.
When I ask to see evidence here, I have been shown evidence AND therefore science. I can even see that the 'belief' can be based on evidence. I think you've hit it there. Bingo.. I think science is not a fabrication when it shows you the reason for why it thinks a certain way. I am still Creo but to deny the evidence of "reality" is silly. So obviously you are correct, the scientific peoples's motives are just, well.....scientific.

Well, thanks for the 'honor vote'. But convincing people is a very hard thing to do,Lol. As you know, I have been quite irrational in the past, I'm still categorised as 'Creo' but to deny scientific finds and evidence (I've came to this clarity) is like saying, "reality is not real'. So I can understand the frustration of the "scientific people's" belief in well...facts,For example if I ignored that and denied Neanderthals skull is shaped differently, I would be denying reality.... irrational 'creo' thought. I'd rather think: "I admitt this FACT despite my belief in Creation, simply because the skull is THERE" - therefore rendering a possibility of evolution in the wiz box. But I will NOT deny a vast array of scientific work throughout the centuries just because I am Creationist, I urge all Creationist to NOT deny reality if you see it.Hope that helped.[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 12-31-2003]