Understanding through Discussion

QuickSearch

 Messages Thread Titles This Thread

 Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
 702 online now: AZPaul3, Dredge, PaulK, Tangle (4 members, 698 visitors) Newest Member: harveyspecter Post Volume: Total: 895,165 Year: 6,277/6,534 Month: 470/650 Week: 8/232 Day: 8/28 Hour: 0/1

EvC Forum Science Forums Creation/Evolution Miscellany

# There is no evolution or creationism - this is the new Matrix/DNA world view

Thread  Details

Author Topic:   There is no evolution or creationism - this is the new Matrix/DNA world view
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member

 Message 16 of 149 (762144) 07-09-2015 10:14 AM Reply to: Message 9 by TheMatrix/DNA07-09-2015 2:26 AM

Re: To Cat Sci
 I tried to get knowledge of the most possible quantity of natural laws and mechanisms enrolled by human natural sciences, from physics to biology to neurology to geology, etc; and I have not found one single law that is not obeyed by the whole natural Universal History described by the theory.

What about F=ma or V=IR? One of Newton's Laws and Ohm's Law.

Newton's 2nd Law of Motion: Force equals mass times acceleration.

Ohm's Law: Voltage equals current times resistance.

How do those fit within your theory?

 This message is a reply to: Message 9 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-09-2015 2:26 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 24 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 2:26 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004

 Message 17 of 149 (762147) 07-09-2015 10:56 AM

So we are privy to a grand unifying theory that incorporates all the know forces and laws of nature and explains everything from the BB to energy manifesting consciousness. *delete.* Waiting for the theory.

Edited by 1.61803, : No reason given.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

 Replies to this message: Message 25 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 3:31 AM 1.61803 has not replied

Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 427
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009

 Message 18 of 149 (762164) 07-09-2015 12:52 PM Reply to: Message 12 by TheMatrix/DNA07-09-2015 4:10 AM

Re: To Capt Stormfield
 It seems that you like to play with words,...

I think you have that exactly ass backwards.

 This message is a reply to: Message 12 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-09-2015 4:10 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

NoNukes
Inactive Member

 Message 19 of 149 (762185) 07-09-2015 2:42 PM Reply to: Message 7 by TheMatrix/DNA07-09-2015 1:09 AM

Re: Testing
 The formula is the algorithmic shape of the flow of energy/information that runs inside the systemic circuity connecting the parts of the system.

Say what? I suppose now that you've explained it, there is no point in me asking for your algorithm.

I'm not surprised that you've never encountered anything on the internet contrary to your ideas.

 The Matrix formula is under evolution like our DNA, its first shape was a light wave and when it arrived at galaxies the formula became a closed system, as the formula above. Then, the system closed its door to evolution, was attacked by entropy, fragmented in its bits-information-photons, which are spreaded as seeds of life, rebuilding the formula as opened systems and in microscopy dimension.

A good friend once told me that there was a line from Blazing Saddles for every occasion. I have such a line in mind, but I wonder if anyone else might have one.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King

If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams

 This message is a reply to: Message 7 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-09-2015 1:09 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 26 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 4:16 AM NoNukes has not replied

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 369 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006

 Message 20 of 149 (762187) 07-09-2015 2:46 PM Reply to: Message 12 by TheMatrix/DNA07-09-2015 4:10 AM

Re: To Capt Stormfield
What is the theory?

 This message is a reply to: Message 12 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-09-2015 4:10 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

NoNukes
Inactive Member

 Message 21 of 149 (762188) 07-09-2015 2:48 PM Reply to: Message 9 by TheMatrix/DNA07-09-2015 2:26 AM

Re: To Cat Sci
 2) In any way the whole theory touches metaphysics or anything beyond the observable universe. So, the theory is not dependable of some untouchable element or entity. It explains every natural phenomena or event inside the universe, and if someone find one, the theory could be debunked.

Explanation is insufficient to establish falsifiability. Does your theory make predictions which can be shown to be correct or incorrect by some experiment. If your theory provides only explanations and no predictions, then it is not falsifiable.

A theory that can explain every conceivable outcome predicts no outcome and explains nothing. But in particular such a theory is not falsifiable.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King

If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams

 This message is a reply to: Message 9 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-09-2015 2:26 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

NoNukes
Inactive Member

 Message 22 of 149 (762191) 07-09-2015 3:01 PM Reply to: Message 14 by Percy07-09-2015 7:31 AM

Re: Link to Relevant Website
 MD may be getting his ideas from here: The Universal Matrix of the Systems and Natural Cycles

More likely source of the ideas here and on the web page are one and the same.

quote:
The period of seven years of research in the jungle between 1980 and 1987 are added to the last 23 years employed in testing the models against the facts and actual events of naturals phenomena.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King

If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams

 This message is a reply to: Message 14 by Percy, posted 07-09-2015 7:31 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 825 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015

 Message 23 of 149 (762259) 07-10-2015 12:49 AM Reply to: Message 13 by Percy07-09-2015 7:28 AM

To Percy
quote:
What are the "seven frequencies/vibration states of a light wave"?.

Hi Percy. Unfortunately, if you want to understand this world view, beginning by light is the wrong way. Because light is the last issue when the theory is describing the Universal Natural History which could be resumed into the history of a system, a unique universal system which has a kind of DNA, here called Matrix formula. This system is under evolution and its most complex shapes are here and now, under our eyes. Here and now we can see it in shape of brain ( the hippocampus is F1, the pituitary is F2, the cortex is F4, and so on), in shape of thorax ( heart is F1, liver is F7 and so on) in shape of the building blocks of DNA ( F1 is the left sugar, F2 is alanine, F3 is guanine, F4 is the right sugar, and so on). Or in the shape of a cell system ( F1 is the nucleus, F3 is ribosome, etc.).

So, if we have the universal system and its eternal formula here and now, why we would begin to understand its existence by focusing its first and primordial shape at 13, 7 billion years ago, as was its light wave shape, and then, the most difficult for us to reach its nature.... It makes no sense.

The Matrix/DNA theory began 50 years ago at life here and now, and walked backwards. It was about 30 years ago I reached the system in its shape of atoms, composing the atomic nebulae before assembling stellar and galactic systems. From atoms and walking backwards we penetrates the world of particles and there, I found that the Nobel Prize Hideki Yukawa and his explanation how a proton glues with a neutron was enough for explaining the origins of the Matrix formula phenotype. Two bi-lateral symmetric bubbles.

But, it was missing something for these bubbles given the next evolutionary step, it was missing some more complexity, which must be inside the bubbles. This mystery was unsolvable by 20 years, till the last year when I was observing the waves formed by the electromagnetic radiation pictured as a spectrum. Suddenly the solution came to mind. The variation of that waves are the same energetic variations of a human body in its 70 years of existence.

What causes the transformation of shapes of a human body is a process called "life's cycle". If the sequence of variations in a radioactive wave is the same sequence of human bodies, then, the force of lifes cycles is acting over the radiation also. But, electromagnetic radiation and light were existing before life's origins. Then, the force of lifes cycles was not invented by living beings, the opposite must be true: living beings, or life, were written into those waves. From gamma ray to radio is encoded the principle of life. And these radiations came at the momentum of the Big Bang, suggesting that they was existing before this universe. Since that it is the code for life and since that it is a genetic phenomenon, it means that beyond and before this universe there was life, so, the unique universal system that is evolving here is also under the process of lifes cycles.

The conclusion is obvious: light is the arms and hands of god if you want to call the natural conscious systems that was existing before as a non magical god in same way that my parents' genomes were their arms and hands for building my body.

So, it was only about a year ago that I went crazy studying everything that I can about light, electromagnetic radiation, etc. But I am at the final understand of this world view, and those that want to understand it, must begin as I did, studying the matrix formula and its systems shape here and now. By the way I will try to bring here a picture revealing how the electromagnetic spectrum fits with the process of lifes cycle. Cheers...

There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

 This message is a reply to: Message 13 by Percy, posted 07-09-2015 7:28 AM Percy has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 27 by Percy, posted 07-10-2015 7:48 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 825 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015

 Message 24 of 149 (762261) 07-10-2015 2:26 AM Reply to: Message 16 by New Cat's Eye07-09-2015 10:14 AM

Re: To Cat Sci
Cat Sci wrote:

quote:
What about F=ma or V=IR? One of Newton's Laws and Ohm's Law.

Newton's 2nd Law of Motion: Force equals mass times acceleration.

Ohm's Law: Voltage equals current times resistance.

How do those fit within your theory?

As I said, I have not found one single law that is not obeyed by the whole natural Universal History described by the theory. About the laws you remembered above, I did not see any slice of that narration of the History that "does not fit with those laws". Then, for to answer how to those fit within the theory it is necessary that I take three heavy books telling about millions of events and explaining how each event fits within the laws.

There is a good method for avoiding that we make a theory full of mistakes when it is peer-reviewed by specialists. And I applied this method. It is about never advances to the next step in your theory before finding in Nature here and now a real proved fact that fits with yours last theoretical conclusion. You need to attach every conclusion in solid grounds, and the unique solid ground is Nature. If there is in Nature another figure that fits with yours last theoretical figure, you can go on. If not, stops, search where you made mistakes, or give up with your theory because you are entering into the reign of metaphysics.

If the results of yous calculations is happening at any another place of Nature, yours results are obeying the Newton's laws, the Ohm's law, the kangaroo's laws, or if not, the Newton's laws would be wrong, because Nature never is wrong.

This supreme requirement of formal logics are not being obeyed by several great theoriss today. One sample is Stephen Hawkings and his theoretical black hole. I am sure, never at any time and any place someone found in Nature a real proved fact that equals to Stephen~s black hole. There is no natural parameter as base for him to believe in his mathematical results. I would stop Matrix/DNA theory just here. But, then, he and others are taking that theoretical model as thru and upon it developing cosmological theories.

When my calculations arrived to the galactic nuclei and it was necessary to calculate what is inside it, I inserted conclusions that were coming from different pathways, I draw a nebular cloud of dusty rotating in space, tried to see what would happening next, etc., and finally got a model that fits as the systemic part of the system that later would produces the first cell system at Earth. I got a picture about what was inside the galactic nuclei, very different than the Hawking model. But... then I searched in Nature and found another place and time the same figure I had from my calculations. And my theory is suggesting that there is no possibility that after the Big bang and the initial extreme singularity, matter and energy could going back to singularity. Before reaching this point, the whole thing should be transformed. Then, I think, the ghost black hole with no parameter in this world does not exist.

It does no mean that you can not find the smallest detail of my theory that those laws does not fit within. That is why I call it a theory: it is not the final thru, mistakes will be find, it is here bor being changed, improved, tested. Maybe one parameter that I found I didn't know the thru about it and it does not fit as parameter. Have a nice time, scientific cat...

There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

 This message is a reply to: Message 16 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-09-2015 10:14 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 28 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-10-2015 11:35 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 825 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015

 Message 25 of 149 (762263) 07-10-2015 3:31 AM Reply to: Message 17 by 1.6180307-09-2015 10:56 AM

Reply to 1.61803
1.61803 wrote:

quote:
So we are privy to a grand unifying theory that incorporates all the know forces and laws of nature and explains everything from the BB to energy manifesting consciousness.

Mr. 1.61803 ( or Mr. Number Phi), if there is such theory, it must explain everything included the cause that you have produced at every place and every moment of the Universal History the beauty of bi-lateral symmetry that those mystical persons call as The Sacred Geometry. The explanation should be extraordinary, because the claim about a sacred geometry is a extraordinary claim. it happens that Matrix/DNA Theory brought to us an extraordinary explanation about Phy. Unfortunately it is written in Portuguese but if you go to
http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?cat=834 you can see it.

I will explain in short terms here because in another post I brought the Matrix formula, so, you can see it. What's, why s there the number phy, why it produces such astonishing effects...

In Matrix formula the Function number 5 has just the value of 1,61803... For finding it you need fix the formula and considering that a whole round of its circuity is fixed as number 1. Then you begin at F1 again and goes to F2, F3, F4. Stops here, you got more 0,5 which added with 1 is 1,5. From F4, instead following the flow to F6, follow the lateral emitted internally flow number 5 and go adding the centimeters, to 1,6... to 1,61803... and stops here. You are just at the center of the sphere.

F5 is the universal systemic function responsible for reproduction of the system. If a system is human species, F4 is the male function and F5 is the spermatozoon function ( you can see the origins of chromosomes at 10 billion years ago here:
http://theuniversalmatrix.com/...dos-cromossomas-sexuais.jpg )

If a system is a cell, the element that performs F5 is the RNA. If it is the building block of astronomical systems, the element is a comet. And so on. Every time it is about reproduction. If a system is the building blocks of DNA F5 is the nitrogenous base called uracil. Always uracil produces a new section of the DNA which makes DNA increasing since its primordial times.

It happens that the Matrix formula above is the shape of the formula as closed system. And the unique moment in this universe that matter reached the state of perfect closed system was when it produced the building block for astronomical systems. But, this system was hermaphrodite, and its reproductive process was self-recycling. Then, the function of F5 was reproducing the left face of that formula into the right face. This mechanism was applied later when there was the RNA world without DNA. It was this function that took the existing RNA as left face and reproducing it as the right face invented the DNA. This mechanism is used till today every time the cell produces a new protein.

So, F5, which location inside the Matrix formula is just 1,61803 is specialized into reproducing an existing left face into a new right face... and voila... we have bi-lateral symmetry. Beauty! The Sacred Geometry... mathematically explained.

Now that the theory has explained the origins of yours name, let it to explain the origins of yours own body. I will suppose that you are 20 years old. So, at 20 years and 9 months ago, there was a single ovule. Suddenly arrive at the center of this ovule a spaceship full of et's, called male genes. And suddenly the spaceship exploded, causing a big perturbation event inside the ovule. it was the spermatozoon membrane that broken up. From here you know the history but letçs remember that at 6 or seven months, emerged inside the embryo a thing called consciousness.

Ok, the nowaday scientific team has a big cosmological theory explaining that this Universe began with a bang. And we know that after 13,7 billion years inside this universe emerged a thing called consciousness. Of course, the scientific team is using the history of yours embryogenese as the history of this universe.

You said that we are privy to a grand unifying theory that incorporates all the know forces, etc. We dos not need such theory, Mr Phi. We already have the thru. Not the theory narrated by the scientific team, because you know that they copied a natural narrative. I am telling about the narrative from Nature. Nature does not plays dice with its creatures, then, if the grand Mother pointed out to yours embryogenesis for explaining the universal, you must believe in it.

Matrix/DNA Theory is all way repetition of known real proved natural phenomena connected under the command of pure reason, as Nature did it. The scientific team does not want to recognize that Nature have revealed here the great unifying theory, so, Matrix came for recognizing it. But this was yours obligation because as number Phy, you are the specialist for doing the best and beauty reproductions.

There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

 This message is a reply to: Message 17 by 1.61803, posted 07-09-2015 10:56 AM 1.61803 has not replied

TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 825 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015

 Message 26 of 149 (762264) 07-10-2015 4:16 AM Reply to: Message 19 by NoNukes07-09-2015 2:42 PM

Nonukes wrote:

quote:
Say what? I suppose now that you've explained it, there is no point in me asking for your algorithm.

Nonukes, you make me worry. I am illiterate in computer sciences, so, maybe I am using wrong words. Maybe the word algorithm does not apply where I am using it, so, I ask you to correct me.

I am using algorithm by this definition: In mathematics and computer science, an algorithm is a self-contained step-by-step set of operations to be performed. Algorithms exist that perform calculation, data processing, and automated reasoning.

Then, I remember the old flow charts learned at high school 30 years ago, and I think that the matrix formula fits as a flow chart. I am describing in the following why and how it works as algorithm. It is wrong, please, tell me.

The Matrix/DNA formula as a closed system algorithm (it is the state of this formula at astronomical scales. To other scales, the instructions must be changed):

F1) Are there raw ingredients in space, in the form of mass and energy, and swirling due rotation of space?
If so, form a whirlpool mixing raw ingredients and cooking them until bubbles are ejected to the external space. The bubbles will be the core of a new astronomical body;
If not, don’t form the whirlpool.

2) The bubble adds more raw and frozen ingredients in the space?
If yes, continue heading into the sidereal space, now under the names of “star-seed” inside a “planet”;
If not, be undone as a bubble.

3) The planet passes close to a star?
If yes, get in their orbits;
If not, continue wandering in space to unravel.

4) The nucleus is reached by the star’s energy?
If yes, start nuclear reactions feeding on the outer layers of ingredients, i.e. the geological layers. Go to F6;
If not, become a moon.
5) Is the nuclear reaction evolving and eating the layers to the surface?
If yes, the pressure form the volcanos ejecting comets (carrying on active nuclear reactions for to activate the whirlpool) and falling internally on the galactic’s spiral towards the core. Go to F1;
If not, freeze like a moon.
6) The nuclear reaction reached the final surface layer?
If yes, self-collapsing becoming a star supernova;
If not, freeze like moon.
7) Were sold out the energy particles within the atoms of the nutrients’ layers?
If yes, self-dissolves into fragmented in ingredient mass to form new whirlpool, and self recycles yours body.
If not, become a giant dead planet of inert gas.
The Matrix/DNA formula for open systems:

1) Being yourself an electromagnetic structure, or atomic, or astronomic, or biological, repeat all steps to F5;

2) Do you want to perpetuate this form of body/life’s cycle/closed system?
If Yes, go internally to the nucleus and repeat his eternal cycle;
If not, go externally to relate to the outer unknown.
Note: for example, if you’re a man, and married, drive all your F5 for a single and same woman, reproducing only a unique type of DNA. If you’re a man, and celibate, drive your F5 to the largest quantity of different women, producing diverse kinds of DNA. Other example: drive yours behaviors to be an extreme nationalist or to be opened to globalization. Or other: as a bird in Galapagos, keep yourself in Galapagos eternally or immigrates to the next island for to be found by Darwin as mutated and naturally selected
- See more at: http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?p=9279#sthas...

There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

 This message is a reply to: Message 19 by NoNukes, posted 07-09-2015 2:42 PM NoNukes has not replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 20972
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 3.3

 Message 27 of 149 (762267) 07-10-2015 7:48 AM Reply to: Message 23 by TheMatrix/DNA07-10-2015 12:49 AM

Re: To Percy
 TheMatrix/DNA writes: Unfortunately, if you want to understand this world view, beginning by light is the wrong way.

It was you who began with light - it was mentioned right up front in your first point.

So the "seven frequencies/vibration states of light" are apparently radio, microwave, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, X-ray and gamma-ray, which is merely one way the electromagnetic spectrum is traditionally divided and is a human, not a natural, construct. We humans divide up the electromagnetic spectrum into ranges in other ways, too. The Wikipedia article on the electromagnetic spectrum divides the spectrum into 19 ranges in the table at the top, and then further on they present another way of dividing the spectrum into 9 ranges. And there are other ways to divide the spectrum. Some birds can see in the ultraviolet, which merges ultraviolet into the visible part of the spectrum, leaving you only six divisions. Some animals can detect the infra-red, putting that also in the visible portion and leaving you only five divisions.

You need to show how your "seven frequencies/vibration states of light" are fundamental to nature and not just an arbitrary human construct.

--Percy

 This message is a reply to: Message 23 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 12:49 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 29 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 2:34 PM Percy has replied Message 38 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-10-2015 9:36 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member

 (1)
 Message 28 of 149 (762275) 07-10-2015 11:35 AM Reply to: Message 24 by TheMatrix/DNA07-10-2015 2:26 AM

Re: To Cat Sci
 Then, for to answer how to those fit within the theory it is necessary that I take three heavy books telling about millions of events and explaining how each event fits within the laws.

Well that right there is a big red flag. We have a lot of people come here telling us that they have some big grand theory. The ones who end up not having anything tangible to provide are the ones who complain that its just too big and complicated to post here.

That's a load of bullshit. We've discussed all kind of really complicated topics from intricate biology to deep cosmology. You can use analogies and metaphors to truncate the concepts into shorter stories.

And if you can't, that's because your theory isn't described well.

 As I said, I have not found one single law that is not obeyed by the whole natural Universal History described by the theory. About the laws you remembered above, I did not see any slice of that narration of the History that "does not fit with those laws".

What do you mean by a law being "obeyed by" the history described by the theory?

Also, how are you employing a null hypothesis?

What have you done to try to prove that there can be a law that does not fit within your theory?

Simply force-fitting every theory you come across into your own theory is going to cause it to be rife with false positives.

For example, the Bohr model of the atom look kinda like a solar system. You could theorize that there is some overarching phenomenon that has caused atoms and solar systems to behave in the same way. But it's really only a superficial resemblance, and without testing your theory against a null hypothesis, you're only going to be able to convince yourself that the overarching phenomenon actually exists.

 There is a good method for avoiding that we make a theory full of mistakes when it is peer-reviewed by specialists. And I applied this method. It is about never advances to the next step in your theory before finding in Nature here and now a real proved fact that fits with yours last theoretical conclusion. You need to attach every conclusion in solid grounds, and the unique solid ground is Nature. If there is in Nature another figure that fits with yours last theoretical figure, you can go on. If not, stops, search where you made mistakes, or give up with your theory because you are entering into the reign of metaphysics.

That is very unscientific. And your approach is more like metaphysics than it is science.

What you are doing is a post-hoc rationalization of your preconceived theory. You're forcing phenomenon to fit within your theory, and when you find something that doesn't, you form the theory around the phenomenon. "The algorithm evolves" you say, but really that's just what you need to do to it to keep it looking like it is alive.

With this approach, your theory will not have any predictive power. It will forever be left to being a descriptive process that can only take into account the things that have already been understood. Your theory may inspire people to look for a new place for scientific inquiry, but scientific inquiry will never be a part of your theory, itself.

 This message is a reply to: Message 24 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 2:26 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 32 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 4:23 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

TheMatrix/DNA
Member (Idle past 825 days)
Posts: 47
From: Newark-NJ-USA
Joined: 06-05-2015

 Message 29 of 149 (762297) 07-10-2015 2:34 PM Reply to: Message 27 by Percy07-10-2015 7:48 AM

Re: To Percy
quote:
It was you who began with light - it was mentioned right up front in your first point.

No, Percy, I don't mentioned it in my first post, only at the second for beginning to explain the formula, and if you don't do that - mentioning what is the end and the final of a new unknown world view - talking only about the middle of the history, it seems to be a building without foundations and roof. Like any cosmological theory, it is necessary to give the famous initial jump in the dark. Standard Theory do that when talking about the Big Bang and the smallest ex-machine atom and the final Big Crunch, the Bible'a theory do that when talking about genesis and the final judgement.

So, unfortunately when any theory arrives to the beginnings or the ends, the final material object encountered touches metaphysics, which is an unsolvable mystery for our limited brain today. That's why I try to escape from the light wave issue. We have in the middle of the building the things we need for improve our lifes here and now, so, why loosing time debating metaphysics...

quote:
So the "seven frequencies/vibration states of light" are apparently radio, microwave, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, X-ray and gamma-ray, which is merely one way the electromagnetic spectrum is traditionally divided and is a human, not a natural, construct. We humans divide up the electromagnetic spectrum into ranges in other ways, too. The Wikipedia article on the electromagnetic spectrum divides the spectrum into 19 ranges in the table at the top, and then further on they present another way of dividing the spectrum into 9 ranges. And there are other ways to divide the spectrum. Some birds can see in the ultraviolet, which merges ultraviolet into the visible part of the spectrum, leaving you only six divisions. Some animals can detect the infra-red, putting that also in the visible portion and leaving you only five divisions.

Exactly Percy, light and electromagnetic radiations are something still far away of our control and scientific knowledge, all we have is human interpretations, theories. Due each person have its specific interpretation, it becomes very difficult to establish universal definitions among the word salad of names. The rational thing to do is trying to fell the phenomena intuitively, with yours mind, without trying to translate it to human languages and is this felling that you need for gasping that the waves revealed by the electromagnetic spectrum flows in the same sequence that yours life flows during yours lifetime. As a baby you are full of non controlled energy like gamma-ray and when becomes a senior, yours energy becomes weak, like showed in the graphic.

If you think in the initial universe as the initial non-fecundated ovule. Then the spatial liquid in the ovule receipts the genomes and starts its history, you can imagine the initial universe fulfilled with a spatial dark substance ( be it called aether, dark matter, Higgs field and so on) receipting the ex-machine genome in shape of light waves. From here, calculating what each broken frequency causes to its specific portion of mass and again connecting these portions, you have a self-assembling natural working ystem. Like the fetus.

I think that our mind and not our reasoning produced by our nowaday current world view is better when grasping details of natural light because our mind could be the cloud of lightening resulting from the electrical sparkings of neuronal synapses. But... in the jungle, after losing all influences from the civilized culture, becoming a half-monkey, you feel Nature and its hidden elements in a different and more pure way. I have observed it in myself and in the behavior of wild animals.

quote:
You need to show how your "seven frequencies/vibration states of light" are fundamental to nature and not just an arbitrary human construct.

Maybe it is my arbitrary human construct, that's why I named my results as a theory ( not a scientific theory, but in the Greek sense of the word, who coined the word). It is a prediction from the theory, not an affirmation, yet, but it is falsifiable. It happens that I looked to the whole thinks we know today about this universe and I found that light waves is the unique thing that fits as the initial spark of this formula, and then, I noticed that if I put the electromagnetic spectrum upon the formula it fits very well, each point of the radioactive flow is in correspondence with each point of the circuity flow in the formula.

As said Einstein, one does not need to prove that his/her theory is the right one, only need to show that it makes sense. After that, it is hand at work testing the theory against real facts and trying experiments that could prove or debunk the predictions from the theory.

Edited by TheMatrix/DNA, : No reason given.

There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

 This message is a reply to: Message 27 by Percy, posted 07-10-2015 7:48 AM Percy has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 30 by Bliyaal, posted 07-10-2015 3:17 PM TheMatrix/DNA has replied Message 40 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-11-2015 12:13 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied Message 41 by ICANT, posted 07-11-2015 12:25 AM TheMatrix/DNA has replied Message 46 by Percy, posted 07-11-2015 7:53 AM TheMatrix/DNA has not replied

Bliyaal
Member (Idle past 1686 days)
Posts: 171
From: Quebec City, Qc, Canada
Joined: 02-17-2012

 Message 30 of 149 (762298) 07-10-2015 3:17 PM Reply to: Message 29 by TheMatrix/DNA07-10-2015 2:34 PM

Re: To Percy
If you want to pretend to do science, at least use the terms accordingly.

Things like this

 that's why I named my results as a theory ( not a scientific theory, but in the Greek sense of the word, who coined the word)

makes people very suspicious here.

 It happens that I looked to the whole thinks we know today about this universe and I found that light waves is the unique thing that fits as the initial spark of this formula, and then, I noticed that if I put the electromagnetic spectrum upon the formula it fits very well, each point of the radioactive flow is in correspondence with each point of the circuity flow in the formula.

I think it's time you give us something to evaluate. Your "formula" would be a good start. No more long words salad posts please. My guess is that you'll quickly loose people's interest in your topic if you continue like this.

 This message is a reply to: Message 29 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-10-2015 2:34 PM TheMatrix/DNA has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 31 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-10-2015 3:38 PM Bliyaal has replied Message 43 by TheMatrix/DNA, posted 07-11-2015 4:05 AM Bliyaal has replied

 Date format: mm-dd-yyyy Timezone: ET (US)
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022